HP iPAQ 914c Business Messenger review
Verdict
Not a bad smartphone, but it can't compete as an overall package with either Nokia's E71 or RIM's BlackBerry Bold.
Review Date: 14 Aug 2008
Reviewed By: Jonathan Bray
Price when reviewed: on £35 per month, 18 month contract (T-mobile)
With the release of the BlackBerry Bold last week and the excellent Nokia E71 before that, other manufacturers of email phones are going to have their work cut out to keep up. It's easy enough, it seems, to cram in the features these days, but both RIM and Nokia manage to combine that feat with excellent ergonomics, design, ease of use and battery life.
So it was with some trepidation that we tackled HP's latest effort - the 914c Business Messenger. At first glance it's very similar to the Bold and E71, with its Qwerty keyboard and candybar form factor. And it's rammed with about as many features as those two devices as well.
It has tri-band HSDPA for fast mobile broadband connection speeds of up to 3.6 or 7.2Mbps, it has built-in Wi-Fi (802.11bg), an assisted GPS receiver and Bluetooth 2.0. It has a three-megapixel camera on its rear with an LED flash and portrait mirror. It even has similar styling cues to the BlackBerry Bold, with attractive strips of silver running, like the frets on an electric guitar, between each row of keys on the keyboard and chrome trim wrapping the front edge.
But elsewhere the 914c has about as much in common with the Nokia and RIM handsets as chalk has with cheese. It's a much larger device than the E71 and heavier than both: and that extra weight makes a surprisingly big difference to how pocketable it feels. Its more angular corners don't help, while the garish blue characters on some of the keys off-set some of the HP's more attractive features.
Its keyboard is usable, and before using the Bold we'd have given it a big thumbs-up. The rounded keys are relatively easy to hit without striking neighbouring buttons and it has dedicated keys for the full stop and comma, plus a pair of useful shortcut keys above it for quick access to your email and calendar. But it simply can't compete with the Bold's class-leading keypad, which is the best we've used on any mobile phone.
The screen is good too. At a standard 320 x 240 resolution it's not particularly special. Further investigation reveals, however, that it's a touchscreen, which does set it apart from both the Nokia and RIM devices.
Again, however, it falls short. It's not transflective as the E71's screen is, which means that outside it's not quite as readable, and neither can it compete with the luxurious display of the Bold. The latter has a higher resolution, is also much easier to read outside and is fantastically colourful and punchy.
Being a Windows Mobile phone doesn't help either. The HP sports the latest version - 6.1 - but this still looks old-fashioned next to the new whizzy-looking BlackBerryOS 4.6. Some manufacturers, such as HTC, try to get around this issue by adding their own 'skin' on top of Windows Mobile's ugly front end, but there's nothing like the Touch Diamond's TouchFlo 3D here.
Version 6.1 doesn't address the age-old problems with Windows Mobile devices either. The touchscreen here is fiddly to use without a stylus and, annoyingly, you can only hook up to one Exchange Server email account at a time. To be fair, though, Office document compatibility out of the box is excellent: you get full Office Mobile with the ability to read and create Office 2007 documents, plus a PDF viewer. And with a beefy 416MHz processor to power it along, it feels nippier than most Windows Mobile phones we've used in the past.
From around the web
I wouldn't buy this one!
I usually never have time nor need to review products, but this one is so pissing me off that I've especially registered here to let you know of my dealings with IPAQ 914c
I use it businesswise +/- 6 months. It's a company's mobile. IMHO this smartphone is really a joke. The major problems are powerconsumption and battery lifetime, freez of application and not user friendly network management. The battery of this phone cannot handle a day with a wifi on. Not to mention the use of other application. Don't even try installing them on your unit (like naviagation software, backup software, skype, other) because this phone is going to die on you almost the minute you do... if you tend to use built-in features like GPS or WIFI or Bluetooth, be sure to switch it off immediatly after you've used them. As IT specialist in our company, I give support to my collegues using those and main issues are the ones I've mentioned above.
As to the design, it looks nice, but is really big and takes a lot of space in your pockets. The keyboard is a nice feature though and the fact that you can use high density SD cards is also a plus (you can't use those cards with IPAQ 614).
Owning this phone is like being in prison: you have to think to recharge it almost every day! think not to forget the charger... and above all... not to forget your phone with you, cause it so huge you don't want to "wear it" on you all the time.
And one more fault in design: the phone is being charged by the same entry your headset is using to produce audio... so no mp3 or handsfree calling when charging. Given the quality of the battery, and the fact that the phone has to charge almost all the time, it means no music and handsfree calling at all
So as far as I am concerned this phone is big big big rubish.
So be aware.
By levinas on 23 Dec 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- How to install Internet Explorer 9
- Maintaining and supporting IE9
- Plan your deployment
- Creating a custom browser package
- Search in corporate environments
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- SAP willing to share HANA with Oracle
- Why using a tablet could harm your health
- New RIM boss: no need for drastic change
- RIM founders fall on their swords
- Slow economy helps boost Red Hat revenue by 23%
- Google+ pages get multiple admins
- One in five companies lack card industry compliance
- Oil industry warns hacking attacks could kill
- British workers fear email monitoring
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why everyone hates the IT department
- Is online shopping security fundamentally broken?
- New cookie laws: why website owners should be worried
- Are work web blockers a waste of time?
- 11 golden rules for virtualisation
- When is it right to go public with security flaws?
- Is your business ready for VoIP?
- Remote working for small businesses
- The Complete Guide to Office 2010
- The complete guide to Office 2010: Web Apps
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
advertisement






