Intel DX58SO review
in Motherboards
Verdict
Far too costly for such an under-specified board.
Review Date: 31 Mar 2009
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £201 (£231 inc VAT)
Buy it now for: £190
(see more store prices)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
Intel created the Core i7 and the X58 chipset, so you might expect it to produce the definitive motherboard. Sadly, the DX58SO seems more like a proof of concept than a real contender.
The DX58SO's most visible shortcoming is its four DIMM sockets. Since the Core i7 uses a triple-channel RAM controller, giving it four sockets makes no sense at all. It gives limited scope to upgrade, and no way to get the best performance once you go past three DIMMs.
It's also notable that Intel has omitted numerous older connectors: there's no IDE, no floppy controller, nor any PS/2 ports. Sure, these connections are all obsolete, but it limits your scope to bring across components and peripherals from an older PC.
Modern-day frills are thin on the ground too. The DX58SO's two PCI Express x16 slots don't support SLI, and there's only one Ethernet socket. If you were hoping for niceties such as onboard displays, you'll be disappointed: Intel's only concession to user-friendliness is a surface-mounted power button, which is neither illuminated nor capped.
That philosophy extends to the ugly proprietary BIOS - although once you find your way around it you do get a fair degree of control over voltages and clock speeds. As with other boards, you can even tweak the base clock to speed up i7-920 and i7-940 chips, which aren't supposed to be overclockable.
The DX58SO's frugal design probably helps keep its power footprint down to 109W - one of this month's most economical. But, incredibly, despite being clearly the least capable board here, the DX58SO is also the most expensive. Hardly a winning combination.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
Best Prices
Price comparison powered by 
| Prices, delivery and availability at 4 retailers | Go | |
|
£191 | Go |
|
£196 | Go |
From around the web
advertisement
- LinkedIn revenue doubles as membership soars
- Kodak kills off cameras
- UK broadband project spending £1m on legal fees
- Microsoft: Windows on ARM won't be sold separately
- Intel pays five hours of profits to settle antitrust case
- Windows 8 on ARM to run desktop apps... but only Office
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Data boost bolsters Vodafone revenue
- Google working on cloud storage system
- Lenovo's profit leaps 54% on market gains
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement






