Dell UltraSharp U2913WM review
Dell goes ultra-wide with its UltraSharp U2913WM monitor, which combines sterling image quality with a novel 21:9 aspect ratio
Review Date: 19 Feb 2013
Reviewed By: Sasha Muller
Price when reviewed: £401 (£481 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
While most widescreen monitors follow the standard 16:9 aspect ratio, the Dell UltraSharp U2913WM dares to be different – it’s the first PC monitor we’ve seen in the unusual 21:9 format.
The monitor uses an IPS panel with a matte anti-glare coating, and cuts an imposing figure on a desk. It’s no taller than a regular 23in widescreen monitor, nor any deeper, but it’s almost 7in wider, giving it a long 29in diagonal and an unfamiliar native resolution of 2,560 x 1,080.
At first, this ultra-wide aspect ratio is disconcerting. With only as much usable height as a Full HD monitor, the 2,560-pixel horizontal resolution makes the Windows desktop look oddly letterboxed. Soon, though, it simply comes to feel like having two 1,280 x 1,024 monitors placed side by side, with the bonus of no bezels to cut the desktop in half. The width makes it possible to spread a large browser window alongside a Word document, or to use the Windows Snap feature to quickly split the monitor down the middle for effective multitasking.
For entertainment, the Dell’s eccentric proportions can be both a blessing and a curse. Games such as Battlefield 3 and Crysis 2 look fantastic, with the ultra-widescreen resolution giving a highly involving, almost cinematic experience. The shape of the screen is also perfect for widescreen movies shot in the 2.33:1 format: with no need for the black bars as seen on 16:9 monitors, the action stretches from corner to corner. With video recorded in a 4:3 or 16:9 aspect ratio, however, the Dell’s extra width is wasted, with wide black bars appearing at the screen’s edges.
Image quality is excellent. At its default settings, the U2913WM reaches a maximum brightness of 349cd/m2, with an exemplary 1,170:1 contrast ratio. This out-of-the-box configuration is perhaps a little warmer than is ideal – we recorded a colour temperature of 5,920K – but overall colour accuracy is excellent, with an average Delta E of only 2.1.
Engage the Dell’s factory-calibrated sRGB mode and things get better still. Although the maximum brightness and contrast ratio drop slightly – to 325cd/m2 and 1,084:1 respectively – colour temperature edges upwards to 6,222K, closer to the ideal of 6,500K, and the average Delta E figure drops to only 1.1.
In terms of physical design, the U2913WM has D-SUB, DVI, HDMI and DisplayPort inputs, as well as a DisplayPort passthrough and a 3.5mm audio output. An integrated USB 3 hub provides two side-facing ports and another two at the rear. Adjustability is another strong point, with the Dell’s stand providing a height adjustment of 130mm, and ample forward and backward tilt.
The UltraSharp U2913WM’s great image quality and features are backed up by a three-year on-site warranty, and an immensely reassuring no-pixel-defect guarantee. Desktop users may prefer a conventional design that affords more vertical breathing room; our recommended ViewSonic VP2770-LED, for example, features a 27in 2,560 x 1,440 panel for not much more money. However, gamers and movie-buffs will revel in the superb visuals and generous screen width of this beautifully realised display.
Author: Sasha Muller
So how does the metro app snapping in Windows 8 work with this ratio? You seem to indicate that it snaps in the middle! Any chance of a photo of that as that is different to a 16:9 screen snap position I have seen.
By stephen_d_morris on 19 Feb 2013
Windows - not Metro - Snap
I suspect that Sasha was writing about the Windows Snap feature on the Desktop, and not about Metro snap...
By gcoupe on 19 Feb 2013
Thanks @gcoupe. I was indeed referring to Windows Snap, not Metro Snap.
By SashaMuller on 19 Feb 2013
You had me, until...
1080 vertical resolution. :-(
I'd certainly look for 1440 or more on the vertical resolution. Screens are generally more than wide enough, it is the vertical resolution that is missing.
By big_D on 19 Feb 2013
And here's me doing a lunchtime check for updates on Thunderbolt Display and along come this.
Now, if it only had a thunderbolt port....
By mfoggin on 19 Feb 2013
Agree with Big_D - too low res
In fact I'd want a minimum 1600px vertical and 3000+ horizontal on that aspect ratio. And 120hz. And a strobing backlight.
By Pleiades on 21 Feb 2013
Sounds good, but where did you get the price of £481 from?
It says £645 on Dell UK website
By lawrencewilkes on 28 Feb 2013
its £467.99 here http://tinyurl.com/cqv4bd6
By manickid on 4 Mar 2013
- School coding: why one teacher training programme failed
- Children should be taught computer science - not programming
- Computing curriculum being introduced "on the cheap"
- Windows apps land on Chromebooks with VMware
- Year of Code adviser quits after a week
- Asus unveils Chromebox with 4K support
- Government pledges £500,000 for teacher code training
- Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 11e: the first hybrid Chromebook
- Consoles, not PCs, will get pupils coding
- Schools don't think Android tablets are secure enough
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Censorship by copyright: Myles Powers and abuse of DMCA takedowns
- Turn an old smartphone into an in-car entertainment system
- Apple's OSes set to surpass Windows
- Block party: why do millions play Minecraft?
- Ebooks: the final chapter for libraries?
- The world's most powerful computers
- Rise of the code schools
- Create a Python game for the Raspberry Pi
- Develop your skills in ICT
- Buyer's guide to tablets
- BenQ MW860USTi vs SMART LightRaise 40wi
- Buyer's guide to foreign language software
- Buyer's guide to all-in-one inkjet printers