ViewSonic VX2336s-LED review
ViewSonic goes back to basics on everything but the IPS panel, resulting in a monitor that performs far better than its price suggests
Review Date: 11 Jul 2012
Reviewed By: Sasha Muller
Price when reviewed: £101 (£121 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
Not so long ago, spending less than £200 on a monitor would have guaranteed a basic TN panel. This is no longer the case, as IPS monitors seep into the mainstream with the promise of great image quality at competitive prices. ViewSonic’s VX2336s-LED is a prime example: it packs in a 23in Full HD IPS panel for only £121.
Sit the ViewSonic alongside the average budget TFT and you’d be hard-pressed to tell it apart. There’s the same frumpy design, the same lightweight build quality, and its styling extends to a strip of glossy black plastic running around the base and the edge of its bezel; it’s unexciting.
There’s precious little in the way of features, either. It has only D-SUB and DVI ports at the rear, along with the power socket.
While the stand wobbles at the slightest provocation, a notch in the base allows cables to be neatly routed out of sight. The onscreen display is basic, with a brightness and contrast control alongside a few presets for colour temperature, but it’s simple to navigate thanks to the four buttons on the front.
For a budget monitor, the ViewSonic’s IPS panel delivers unusual levels of refinement. Test images that often look undersaturated on TN panels oozed with rich, saturated primary colours. If it weren’t for the frumpy plastic body, you’d think you were looking at a far pricier monitor.
Putting the ViewSonic to the test with our X-Rite colorimeter, we saw fantastic results. The maximum brightness of 287cd/m2 may not be the highest we've ever seen but it’s ample, and a contrast ratio of 1,025:1 is exemplary. Its colour accuracy is up with the best, too, with a Delta E of 2.7, and while the low gamma of 2.04 leaves images looking a little paler than is ideal, the colour temperature measured an almost perfect 6,552K. For a monitor costing only £121, it’s a fine performance.
Closer inspection reveals flaws, however. The LED backlight is reasonably power-efficient – the ViewSonic drew a modest 18W when calibrated to a brightness of 120cd/m2 – but it isn’t as parsimonious as others. The backlight leaks around the panel’s edges, and it’s noticeably patchier than the more expensive award-winners this month.
Then there’s the question of response time. ViewSonic quotes a grey-to-grey (GTG) response time of 6ms, but that’s optimistic. Compared to the almost flawless performance of Dell’s U2312HM (quoted at 8ms), the ViewSonic exhibited more obvious smearing around the edges of fast-moving objects, particularly with swift camera pans in action movies.
At this price, however, they’re not killer blows. ViewSonic has gone back to basics and built a monitor that delivers good image quality at a far lower price than we’d expect. For those craving a taste of the high end, the VX2336s-LED redefines what we expect from a budget monitor.
Author: Sasha Muller
Proper ratio version?
Damn fool question, I know, but does this come in proper work related proportions or does it only come in useless widescreen????
By mrmiley on 11 Jul 2012
I can't see any reference to if the screen is shiny (Boooo! rubbish) or matt (yaaayyy, hoorah!) finish?
By mrmiley on 11 Jul 2012
The screen is full HD, so it is 16x9 aspect ratio. I think we can take it as read that it is glossy. Try the Dell as that rotates to give you a very work related 9x16 ratio.
By tirons1 on 11 Jul 2012
It's a matte screen, as, in fact, are most PC monitors. Glossy models are actually pretty rare, and so are something I'd always mention in a review.
As for 'work-related' proportions, no, this is the only version of this monitor. In fact, you're highly unlikely to see a resurgence in 16:10 monitors.
If you really have your heart set on 16:10, then keep an eye on the website. There's another monitor review coming shortly which may pique your interest.
Deputy Reviews Editor
By SashaMuller on 12 Jul 2012
- Tech firms shell out to prevent another Heartbleed
- Cisco: 100% of companies hosting malware
- Brits willing to pay for secure web services
- Google creates Maps time machine
- Facebook scores with mobile advertising
- Cook: Microsoft should have released Office for iPad sooner
- What's on this week's PC Pro podcast?
- Universal wireless charging gets a boost from Microsoft
- Amazon Phone: release date, features and 3D display
- Apple offers sneak peak at OS X via Beta Seed
- Hello Cortana, it's nice to meet you
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- How to upgrade from Windows XP to Ubuntu
- The great iPhone ripoff and how it works
- Heartbleed: what you need to know and do
- Data recovery: inside the clean room
- Best tablet PCs to buy in 2014
- How much RAM do you really need?
- News of the weird: the strangest ever tech stories
- Five hyped technologies: disruptive or not?
- Piracy's dying: why we're all going straight
- Office: should you buy it, rent it - or dump it?
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word