ViewSonic VX2336s-LED review
ViewSonic goes back to basics on everything but the IPS panel, resulting in a monitor that performs far better than its price suggests
Review Date: 11 Jul 2012
Reviewed By: Sasha Muller
Price when reviewed: £101 (£121 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
Not so long ago, spending less than £200 on a monitor would have guaranteed a basic TN panel. This is no longer the case, as IPS monitors seep into the mainstream with the promise of great image quality at competitive prices. ViewSonic’s VX2336s-LED is a prime example: it packs in a 23in Full HD IPS panel for only £121.
Sit the ViewSonic alongside the average budget TFT and you’d be hard-pressed to tell it apart. There’s the same frumpy design, the same lightweight build quality, and its styling extends to a strip of glossy black plastic running around the base and the edge of its bezel; it’s unexciting.
There’s precious little in the way of features, either. It has only D-SUB and DVI ports at the rear, along with the power socket.
While the stand wobbles at the slightest provocation, a notch in the base allows cables to be neatly routed out of sight. The onscreen display is basic, with a brightness and contrast control alongside a few presets for colour temperature, but it’s simple to navigate thanks to the four buttons on the front.
For a budget monitor, the ViewSonic’s IPS panel delivers unusual levels of refinement. Test images that often look undersaturated on TN panels oozed with rich, saturated primary colours. If it weren’t for the frumpy plastic body, you’d think you were looking at a far pricier monitor.
Putting the ViewSonic to the test with our X-Rite colorimeter, we saw fantastic results. The maximum brightness of 287cd/m2 may not be the highest we've ever seen but it’s ample, and a contrast ratio of 1,025:1 is exemplary. Its colour accuracy is up with the best, too, with a Delta E of 2.7, and while the low gamma of 2.04 leaves images looking a little paler than is ideal, the colour temperature measured an almost perfect 6,552K. For a monitor costing only £121, it’s a fine performance.
Closer inspection reveals flaws, however. The LED backlight is reasonably power-efficient – the ViewSonic drew a modest 18W when calibrated to a brightness of 120cd/m2 – but it isn’t as parsimonious as others. The backlight leaks around the panel’s edges, and it’s noticeably patchier than the more expensive award-winners this month.
Then there’s the question of response time. ViewSonic quotes a grey-to-grey (GTG) response time of 6ms, but that’s optimistic. Compared to the almost flawless performance of Dell’s U2312HM (quoted at 8ms), the ViewSonic exhibited more obvious smearing around the edges of fast-moving objects, particularly with swift camera pans in action movies.
At this price, however, they’re not killer blows. ViewSonic has gone back to basics and built a monitor that delivers good image quality at a far lower price than we’d expect. For those craving a taste of the high end, the VX2336s-LED redefines what we expect from a budget monitor.
Author: Sasha Muller
Proper ratio version?
Damn fool question, I know, but does this come in proper work related proportions or does it only come in useless widescreen????
By mrmiley on 11 Jul 2012
I can't see any reference to if the screen is shiny (Boooo! rubbish) or matt (yaaayyy, hoorah!) finish?
By mrmiley on 11 Jul 2012
The screen is full HD, so it is 16x9 aspect ratio. I think we can take it as read that it is glossy. Try the Dell as that rotates to give you a very work related 9x16 ratio.
By tirons1 on 11 Jul 2012
It's a matte screen, as, in fact, are most PC monitors. Glossy models are actually pretty rare, and so are something I'd always mention in a review.
As for 'work-related' proportions, no, this is the only version of this monitor. In fact, you're highly unlikely to see a resurgence in 16:10 monitors.
If you really have your heart set on 16:10, then keep an eye on the website. There's another monitor review coming shortly which may pique your interest.
Deputy Reviews Editor
By SashaMuller on 12 Jul 2012
- Energy firms forced to use QR codes on bills
- Google to release "wearable" Android within a fortnight
- US cybersecurity official: What does ISP mean?
- Cameron: 5G networks will download movies in a second
- Europol warns: public Wi-Fi isn't safe
- Privacy groups challenge Facebook's WhatsApp buy
- IDC: iPad intertia opens door for Windows tablets
- Chip breakthrough to eliminate checkout queues
- Rivals put on notice as Spotify snaps up The Echo Nest
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 leaks via Microsoft's website
- Quickest way to upload 1GB? Hop on a train
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Old-school internet scams: five that just won't die
- Bitcoin believers not worried by Mt. Gox disarray
- How to hack your car
- Small server vs cloud: which is best for SMBs?
- Block party: why do millions play Minecraft?
- What to do if you’re still on Windows XP
- Microsoft Word: top 20 secret features
- Measuring me: is your body the future of security?
- The best mobile apps for business
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book