Viewsonic VP2765-LED review
Good build and an adjustable stand, but image quality is mediocre for a professional TFT
Review Date: 1 Dec 2011
Reviewed By: Sasha Muller
Price when reviewed: (£329 inc VAT)
ViewSonic makes bold claims for the latest addition to its LED Professional range. The 27in VP2765-LED is targeted at design, architectural and medical applications, as well as video production, and in ViewSonic's own words is "the ultimate professional-grade LCD monitor".
It certainly looks like it means business. The huge, claw-like stand does an outstanding job of keeping the VP2765-LED planted and stable on a desk, and the build quality is surprisingly good for the money. The adjustable stand is a bit clunky in operation - we had to guide it up and down with two hands - but it rises up to 130mm above the desk, and pivots into a portrait orientation.
Connectivity is excellent. It has DVI, D-SUB and DisplayPort video inputs, and the USB 2 hub provides two ports at the rear and another two on the monitor's left-hand edge. The integrated power supply is welcome, too.
While we've seen several 27in monitors using TN and IPS panels, and even one sporting Samsung's fledgling PLS panel technology, ViewSonic has bucked the trend by opting for an A-MVA panel. With a claimed contrast ratio of 3,000:1 and maximum brightness of 300cd/m2, it certainly sounds like a good choice.
In our tests it got off to a strong start. The measured contrast ratio of 2,428:1 and brightness of 316cd/m2 are a whisker away from ViewSonic's claims, and the average Delta E of 4.4 indicates that colour accuracy isn't too bad at all. At a glance, it's a monitor that delivers bright, punchy images.
The first disappointment, however, is the screen resolution. Where Hazro's HZ27WC accommodates a huge 2,560 x 1,440 panel, this ViewSonic sticks with a rather underwhelming 1,920 x 1,080. It's a poor decision on such a sizable professional monitor, with the obvious pixel structure leaving images and text lacking in sharpness.
Other glaring issues soon became apparent. Our suite of test images looked far from their usual selves, and both skintones and primary colours were dogged by a subtly unnatural tint. Further testing with our X-Rite colorimeter soon pinpointed the issue: the monitor's default colour temperature of 6,500K actually measured nearer 7,500K, and the gamma of 1.93 was well off from the ideal of 2.2. The results were obvious to the naked eye, with the high colour temperature lending images a cold, bluish tinge, and the low gamma reading adding a washed out look.
The final blow came when we tasked the ViewSonic with video playback. The dim, grainy Blu-ray of Black Swan presents a stern challenge to any display, and the VP2765-LED simply couldn't cope: ghosting trailed the ballet dancers as they swept across the screen, and even slow-moving scenes saw the A-MVA panel struggling to keep up.
It's a desperately uneven performance. Despite good build and a great stand, the mediocre image quality and Full HD resolution leave it placed awkwardly between cheaper 23in Full HD displays and superior 27in models. We applaud ViewSonic's attempts to bring a professional monitor to market at such an affordable price, but for all its bravado the Viewsonic VP2765-LED is impossible to recommend.
Author: Sasha Muller
As regards resolution, for those of us with poorish eyesight, a display of 1,920 x 1,080 on a large monitor is like a breath of fresh air.
By Bureaunet on 1 Dec 2011
"a breath of fresh air"? Shouldn't that be "a sight for sore eyes"?
Sorry, couldn't resist :-)
By JohnHo1 on 2 Dec 2011
Any chance of reviewing that?
I am guessing it's newer than the B2712HDS ...
Bonus of better ergonomics with height adjustments...
But I did call the B2712HDS the "MD Special" for aging MD's who's eyes were failing, but wanted to see more information on their screen at one time... but vanity prevents them wearing glasses!
By gingerinc on 15 Dec 2011
- Struggling Square payments startup could be up for sale
- Nokia Lumia 2520 tablet sales halted over faulty charger
- Microsoft slashes custom XP support price
- Amazon Phone: does anyone want a 3D handset?
- Virgin email fiasco hits thousands of users
- Chrome Remote Desktop now available on Android
- Google posts "average quarter" with slow growth
- What's on this week's PC Pro podcast?
- BBC iPlayer lets Android devices download shows
- Google's Project Ara modular phone arrives in January
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- How to upgrade from Windows XP to Ubuntu
- The great iPhone ripoff and how it works
- Heartbleed: what you need to know and do
- Data recovery: inside the clean room
- Best tablet PCs to buy in 2014
- How much RAM do you really need?
- News of the weird: the strangest ever tech stories
- Five hyped technologies: disruptive or not?
- Piracy's dying: why we're all going straight
- Office: should you buy it, rent it - or dump it?
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs