Acer DX241H review
in Monitors
Verdict
A neat idea poorly implemented: you can buy a cheap PC and a better quality screen for a similar price
Review Date: 2 Jun 2011
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: £249 (£299 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Image Quality
![]()
From around the web
Not fit for purchase
Reading your review, it's incredulous that Acer has the audacity to release such a shockingly poor and not fit for purchase piece of hardw... junk.
This should be classed as criminal activity, selling something that clearly does not work!
By treadmill on 2 Jun 2011 ![]()
Hmmm, why did I type purchase? Should have been purpose.
By treadmill on 2 Jun 2011 ![]()
Suits Some
No doubt the price will drop to a more reasonable street price at a level people will be willing to pay for a simple internet device. Not everyone will want to use it for watching HD content. I presume for normal internet use there should be no issues and therefore a reasonable buy at the correct price. A price similar to a good netbook with a much more confortable to view screen.
By Manuel on 2 Jun 2011 ![]()
Looks like a good idea
I think that this idea will catch on. 9 times out of 10, I am happy to have just Internet access and media playback. Perhaps the next iteration will be the one to buy.
Or perhaps it won't catch on until Apple popularise it, like they did with tablet computers.
By ramjam on 2 Jun 2011 ![]()
Looks like a good idea
I think that this idea will catch on. 9 times out of 10, I am happy to have just Internet access and media playback. Perhaps the next iteration will be the one to buy.
Or perhaps it won't catch on until Apple popularise it, like they did with tablet computers.
By ramjam on 2 Jun 2011 ![]()
Acer don't do software!
This is typical of Acer, to produce a product that's incomplete. Although they build affordable reasonable quality hardware they seem to see software as a necessary evil. Most of the Acer cr*pware is just that and they don't provide any upgrades to software or drivers over the life of a product.
By milliganp on 3 Jun 2011 ![]()
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement







