Apple MacBook Pro 17in review
in Laptops
Verdict
Aside from the extraordinary screen, it's typical Apple: impeccable design and build quality meets merely average value for money.
Review Date: 16 Mar 2009
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: £1,695 (£1,949 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
Apple's products are some of the most divisive and compelling in the industry, so it's no surprise that the 15.4in MacBook Pro prompted plenty of debate. The good looks, solid design and build were offset by a number of niggles: some disliked the scrabble-tile keyboard, others baulked at the non-removable battery, and plenty didn't approve of the unusual button-free trackpad.
For all the fuss back then about aluminium construction and button-less trackpads, though, the most striking feature of the new 17in MacBook Pro is more traditional: the screen. It's not an RGB LED panel, such as the impressive panel on the Dell Studio XPS 16, but traditional white LED technology. No matter: the screen is remarkable, matching the Dell's with fantastic colour range, accuracy and clarity.
You can do plenty with it as well, thanks to the 1,900 x 1,200 native resolution. It's the highest currently available on a portable, and offers significantly more space than the 1,680 x 1,050 screen on the Dell. It's a close-run thing, but if multi-tasking and perfect colour reproduction are vital to you, then the Apple's screen is unbeatable.
The screen is bordered by the same classy black surround as the 15.4in MacBook Pro, and Apple's focus on good design and sturdy build quality is evident throughout. The famed 'unibody' construction, whereby the laptop is crafted from a single block of aluminium, has resulted in superb build quality: there's no squashy wrist-rest or unnervingly flexible lid here. This quality is matched by the minimalist style that is now the norm for Apple notebooks. From any angle, this is a good-looking laptop.
The trackpad remains both the main innovation and bone of contention in usability terms. As with the 15.4in model, our first few minutes saw us constantly attempting to click the bottom of the pad, where the mouse buttons would ordinarily be. Instead, the mouse pad itself functions as one large button, with several 'multitouch' functions available in specific applications, and other controls for navigating OS X more easily: swiping four fingers horizontally, for instance, is the OS X equivalent of ALT-TAB. Swipe four fingers up and your open applications glide to the edges of the screen to reveal the desktop. Inevitably, the gestures don't work in Vista, although a two-fingered click brings up context menus.
The keyboard uses the scrabble-tile layout also seen on Sony's VAIO laptops, but we're not entirely convinced. While the base of the keyboard is solid, the keys themselves are a little flimsy and lack travel. The under-key LED is a useful addition, however, for typing in the dark.
As with the 15.4in MacBook Pro, the ports are grouped on the left-hand edge. The 17in MacBook Pro gains a USB port over its 15.4in sibling, bringing the total to three. You also get Gigabit Ethernet, FireWire 800, audio in and out, an ExpressCard/34 slot and a Mini-DisplayPort output. When compared to almost any rival, however, the MacBook Pro's offering seems stingy. There's no eSATA, for instance, and a few more USB ports wouldn't go amiss. The lack of a standard display output is also an annoyance: a converter from Mini-DisplayPort to DVI costs £17 before VAT; a converter to Dual-Link DVI costs an extortionate £68 before VAT.
The Intel Core 2 Duo Mobile T9550 processor runs at 2.66GHz and delivered a benchmark result of 1.34, which is excellent. It's more than enough to motor through OS X and demanding design and creative applications. Gaming performance is just as assured, at least at lower detail settings. Like the 15.4in MacBook Pro, the 17in version has two GPUs: an Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT and an lower-power Nvidia 9400M chip for prolonged battery life. The latter isn't up to gaming, but in our medium-quality Crysis benchmark the 9600M GT scored 22fps; dropping the settings to Low resulted in an eminently-playable 76fps.
From around the web
advertisement
- LinkedIn revenue doubles as membership soars
- Kodak kills off cameras
- UK broadband project spending £1m on legal fees
- Microsoft: Windows on ARM won't be sold separately
- Intel pays five hours of profits to settle antitrust case
- Windows 8 on ARM to run desktop apps... but only Office
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Data boost bolsters Vodafone revenue
- Google working on cloud storage system
- Lenovo's profit leaps 54% on market gains
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement





