Y-Cam Black SD review
in IP cameras
Verdict
A simple but nonetheless very likeable camera for day and night surveillance
Review Date: 13 Jan 2010
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £154 (£181 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
![]()
From around the web
Y-Cam
I have had one of these camera's for a year now and have been reasonably impressed. I use mine outside as you can purchase a shell which protects the camera from the elements. I have had issues with setting up email triggers as it can send far too many pictures. I also have had problems with setting up wireless connectivity using encryption (works without). I therefore installed a CAT6 cable which circumnavigates the issue.Since I have mounted the camera outside of my house I have yet to have any repeats of anti-social behaviour although I do have to display a CCTV warning sign as the public footpath is in clear view.
For a live view of my camera: http://78.32.184.35:8150
By Dr_Aspirin on 17 Jan 2010 ![]()
Y-Cam used externally
I have had one of these camera's for a year now and have been reasonably impressed. I use mine outside as you can purchase a shell which protects the camera from the elements. I have had issues with setting up email triggers as it can send far too many pictures. I also have had problems with setting up wireless connectivity using encryption (works without). I therefore installed a CAT6 cable which circumnavigates the issue.Since I have mounted the camera outside of my house I have yet to have any repeats of anti-social behaviour although I do have to display a CCTV warning sign as the public footpath is in clear view.
For a live view of my camera: http://78.32.184.35:8150
By Dr_Aspirin on 17 Jan 2010 ![]()
£180 for a camera?
Not good quality judging by the above live view!
By skgiven on 21 Jan 2010 ![]()
It depends on whether you mean day or night. The camera is mounted at 3m and therefore night vision isn't going to be great. During the day I think it is reasonably clear. Forget the pink tinge - it's normal for this camera for night vision.
By Dr_Aspirin on 21 Jan 2010 ![]()
Great little device
I picked up the white version of this camera (Knight SD ) a few weeks ago and its been nothing but a god send for me - I've had a few ip cameras over the years and the picture quality of this camera far exceeds the panasonic and d-link cams I had - and with built in SD card, it means the NAS I was using to record on to has now ended up attached to my media centre ;) haha. Great camera for the money
By bonkerz on 1 Feb 2010 ![]()
cant see your live view
Dr Aspirin, its asking for username password to view your live view. I would like to view it if thats ok to see the quality?
By chrisbather on 26 Feb 2010 ![]()
cant see your live view
Dr Aspirin, its asking for username password to view your live view. I would like to view it if thats ok to see the quality?
By chrisbather on 26 Feb 2010 ![]()
poor night vision
I have one of these cameras & can't understand how it got full marks for performance? The daytime image makes grass look pink & fuzzy and the night time picture is none existant with the waterproof shell in place! All you can see is the ir led's reflecting in the plastic covering the lens. I bought this camera on PCPro's recomendation but I'm afraid it's very poor quality & I'm sending it back. If you Google y-cam you'll see loads of people have had problems with it. If you want a good picture on any camera don't put the led's inside the case, you need a seperate infra red floodlight.
By GlidemanUK on 24 Apr 2010 ![]()
Like the camera and support
I bought Y-cam black SD and a waterproof shell a week ago. I was having same problem as GlindmanUK. was so upset about the led´s reflection from the plastic cover. calling them to complain. I found out it was my installation problem. ( like most people I guess, I have not learn to read the manual before setup ;-) ). now it is working perfectly. a bit embrassing, that is why I leave this comment.
By jakie on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






