PC Tools Spyware Doctor 4 review
A great product, but it falls slightly behind its main competitor when it comes to updates
Review Date: 22 Sep 2006
Reviewed By: Davey Winder
Price when reviewed: (£23 inc VAT)
It's no bad thing to say that not a great deal has changed since Spyware Doctor 3.8. It's certainly true when it comes to performance: our tests expose programs to 20 carefully selected keylogger, rootkit, spyware and malware threats, a few at a time, to reflect real-world infection patterns. Detecting, removing and blocking all 20 successfully, Spyware Doctor isn't only a top performer, but a speedy one too: 40% quicker than Spy Sweeper (see above). The downside is that it ties up more processing cycles, without the option of throttling back resource usage.
New to this version is an enhanced ignore list that uses integrity checks to prevent malware escaping detection, as well as an improvement to the browser activity scanner, which now detects malicious cookies stored by Firefox as well as IE. PC Tools has added an option of creating a System Restore point prior to threat removal, in addition to the built-in quarantine and restore feature - the first anti-spyware application to do this. Like Spy Sweeper, it can detect the new breed of malware that installs as a driver, and has an equivalent to Webroot's real-time protection shields in the form of guards. These include a site guard to warn of potentially dangerous websites, a keylogger guard and a process guard that not only kills spyware processes and stops them launching, but does so at kernel level.
Unfortunately, the IM guard was taken out of service when we reviewed the product due to support issues. Unlike Spy Sweeper, Alternate Data Streams (ADS) detection is toggled off by default, apparently because there are no known threats in the wild and it affects scanning times - an error of judgement in our opinion. The automatic search for updates is toggled off by default too, and the update process is far from automatic or silent.
We're assured many of these rough edges will be smoothed off when version 5 is released. But the fact that version 4, despite performing as well in the Labs as Spy Sweeper, has those rough edges ruins its A List chances.
Author: Davey Winder
- Europol warns: public Wi-Fi isn't safe
- Privacy groups challenge Facebook's WhatsApp buy
- IDC: iPad intertia opens door for Windows tablets
- Chip breakthrough to eliminate checkout queues
- Rivals put on notice as Spotify snaps up The Echo Nest
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 leaks via Microsoft's website
- Bitcoin "founder" says: you've got the wrong man
- Has bitcoin creator been found?
- HTC Desire 310: more competition for the Moto G
- Mozilla questions why Dell charges £16 to install Firefox
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Old-school internet scams: five that just won't die
- Bitcoin believers not worried by Mt. Gox disarray
- How to hack your car
- Small server vs cloud: which is best for SMBs?
- Block party: why do millions play Minecraft?
- What to do if you’re still on Windows XP
- Microsoft Word: top 20 secret features
- Measuring me: is your body the future of security?
- The best mobile apps for business
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book
- 1.6TB SSD: why would you need one?