ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite 7.1 review
A small footprint and price, but the results don't make it good value.
Review Date: 6 Dec 2007
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: per year for 3 PCs
When we reviewed ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite 7.1 a few issues ago (web ID: 125307), we were disappointed. Having raised our expectations and won a place on our A List with the XP-only edition of the suite, Check Point followed with this supposedly Vista-compatible version that in fact offered only a subset of the program's features when run on Vista.
As we noted then, it's still a respectable package at heart. ZoneAlarm's particular strength in our tests was protection from website-based threats: it intercepted the attempted downloads from every one of the bad sites we visited. This is a good area to be strong in, too, as browser exploits are now one of the most common sources of infection.
When it came to more traditional malware, though, ZoneAlarm struggled to keep up, coming joint-ninth in a field of 12. A detection rate of 89% isn't the end of the world, but most other packages did better.
The firewall didn't impress us, either: in our false-positives test, it complained no fewer than 17 times, and during the penetration test we were bombarded with far more requesters than necessary. Worse, we still managed to get in to the system through eight different points of vulnerability, including one used by the old Netsphere remote-access backdoor.
ZoneAlarm can claim a small memory footprint and a minimal impact on startup time, and its triple pack of annual licences for just £30 undercuts all its competitors on price. Sad to say, though, our experiences suggest that choosing this version of the suite would be a false economy.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
- Met Police unveils FALCON to fight cybercrime
- Send a text and these SSDs will self-destruct
- iOS 8.0.2: old problems remain, new bugs added
- Apple patches ShellShock Bash bug
- Ello knocked offline by DDoS attack
- Mozilla patches Firefox NSS vulnerability
- Apple "working quickly" to fix Bash bug
- Bash bug: is it worse than Heartbleed?
- Password scam targeted eBay since February
- Google to follow Apple with device encryption
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- Apple Watch, iPhone 6 and 6 Plus: Tim Cook's Apple back with a bang?
- BT Home Hub 5: how to get maximum speed
- 20 years of PC Pro: one-star reviews (including "the worst tablet we've ever seen")
- Five worst SMB security threats... and how to solve them
- Heartbleed: what you need to know and do
- Measuring me: is your body the future of security?
- The top five consumer security threats for 2014
- Windows XP: Microsoft’s ticking time bomb
- The top five SMB security trends for 2014
- Securing the Internet of Things
- My PC is infected: what now?
- When coding becomes a crime
- Mobile web blocking: what it reveals about porn filtering plans
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Please stop reposting fake Facebook messages
- Is Facebook safe for business?
- Don't rely on Chrome's password vault
- Facebook Graph Search: don't panic
- Gmail drafts and Pastebin: could they evade the email snoops?
- Applying for a job at GCHQ? Here's your plain-text password
- Google two-step verification: a must for business email
- Yes, I write down my passwords