ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite 7.1 review
Verdict
A small footprint and price, but the results don't make it good value.
Review Date: 6 Dec 2007
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: per year for 3 PCs
When we reviewed ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite 7.1 a few issues ago (web ID: 125307), we were disappointed. Having raised our expectations and won a place on our A List with the XP-only edition of the suite, Check Point followed with this supposedly Vista-compatible version that in fact offered only a subset of the program's features when run on Vista.
As we noted then, it's still a respectable package at heart. ZoneAlarm's particular strength in our tests was protection from website-based threats: it intercepted the attempted downloads from every one of the bad sites we visited. This is a good area to be strong in, too, as browser exploits are now one of the most common sources of infection.
When it came to more traditional malware, though, ZoneAlarm struggled to keep up, coming joint-ninth in a field of 12. A detection rate of 89% isn't the end of the world, but most other packages did better.
The firewall didn't impress us, either: in our false-positives test, it complained no fewer than 17 times, and during the penetration test we were bombarded with far more requesters than necessary. Worse, we still managed to get in to the system through eight different points of vulnerability, including one used by the old Netsphere remote-access backdoor.
ZoneAlarm can claim a small memory footprint and a minimal impact on startup time, and its triple pack of annual licences for just £30 undercuts all its competitors on price. Sad to say, though, our experiences suggest that choosing this version of the suite would be a false economy.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
From around the web
advertisement
- Facebook hacker jailed for 12 months
- The Pirate Bay returns after DDoS attack
- Hackers target Android as mobile malware soars
- Apple patches Leopard, despite ending support last year
- Apple patches multiple security issues
- Government promises "strict safeguards" for web snooping
- Pirate Bay: stop attacking ISPs over court ban
- Twitter casts doubt on leak of 55,000 logins
- FBI warns travellers to beware attacks via hotel Wi-Fi
- Bumper Microsoft patch revisits old flaw
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Five ways to destroy your data
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- Top ten password cracking techniques
- London riots: why pirates share the blame with parents
- Security school: academics take on cyberterrorists
- Inside job: anatomy of a bank card heist
- CSI smartphone
- Is this the golden age of hacking?
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why antivirus is fighting a losing battle in your office
- Four year olds used to steal their parents' data
- An acceptable use policy for your kids
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Pavement hacking: What it is and how to avoid it
- Google's risky pre-loaded pages
- Mac under attack: how secure is Apple's OS?
- Has your browser been hijacked?
advertisement






