Windows Live OneCare review
Verdict
A big improvement from Microsoft, but there's still some way to go.
Review Date: 6 Dec 2007
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: per year for 3 PCs
Last time we looked at OneCare, it was a huge let-down, delivering a dreadful user experience and minimal protection (see web ID: 120456). While OneCare still has some way to go, it's heading in the right direction, as shown by its score of 88% in our malware-detection test. Admittedly, this was this month's second-worst performance, but at just 4% behind the group average it's high enough overall for OneCare to now call itself a serious contender.
It's a shame that email-borne threats aren't inspected as they arrive. This neglect of email also extends to spam, which is left to Windows Mail's standard junk filter. There's no frontline protection against phishing emails, either.
Thankfully, when we actually visited some bad websites, OneCare leapt to life, stopping 86% of attempted malevolent downloads. Its firewall capabilities were impressive, too, making the test PC wholly invisible to our scanners and impervious to attack.
Although this improved detection comes with an attractively low impact on system resources, OneCare still manages to make itself inconvenient when malware is found. While all other packages manage to neutralise threats in a matter of seconds, OneCare habitually takes a minute or more to clean up an infected file as you try to download it (locking the browser window while it does so, so you can't even continue surfing while it works). Worse, it then often demands that you restart the whole machine to complete the process. Although OneCare is better than it was, it needs to grow out of nonsense such as this before we can recommend it.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
From around the web
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






