McAfee Total Protection 2008 review
Verdict
A heavyweight package, but one that lacks punch in crucial areas.
Review Date: 6 Dec 2007
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: per year for 3 PCs
When we last reviewed McAfee's VirusScan Plus product (web ID: 120455), we found it offered a creditable user experience but, sadly, wasn't terribly good at detecting malware.
This month, McAfee Total Protection put in a similar performance. It excelled in several areas: the SiteAdvisor system warned us away from the links in 90% of our phishing emails and 100% of our actively malicious websites. Its spam filter tied with AVG for first place when used in conjunction with the Windows Mail junk filter. And, if you run into trouble, you can open a live chat with a support technician.
Yet, at the fundamental business of detecting malware, McAfee Total Protection was one of the weakest packages we tested, tying with ZoneAlarm in ninth place with a score of 89%. The firewall was a disappointment, too: our scan discovered 15 open TCP ports and six potential vulnerabilities, and our false-positives test prompted six alerts.
Total Protection's generous feature set includes local backup, network management and an "offensive content filter". This may excuse the comparatively high price, but it also carries a cost in terms of system resources: the package's RAM footprint is one of this month's largest, and the boot time one of the slowest.
Total Protection has many good points, but it's hard for us to recommend when other, cheaper, lighter packages are better at the basics. If you do splash out, though, you'll be pleased to know you're entitled not only to signature updates but free upgrades to any new versions of the software that may come out during your licence period.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
From around the web
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






