Skip to navigation

XGI Volari V8 Ultra review

Verdict

Reports of XGI overhauling the big two on its first outing are overstated, and noise and power consumption are an issue, but revised drivers may change the picture.

Review Date: 22 Jan 2004

Reviewed By: David Fearon

Price when reviewed:

And those all-important performance results from the V8 Ultra initially aren't too encouraging, as performance is a long way below ATi and nVidia's current mid-range parts. In 3DMark2001 SE, the V8 could only manage 4,153 at 1,280 x 1,024 with anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering on maximum, as opposed to the 5,743 of an ATi Radeon 9600 XT or 5,831 of an nVidia FX 5700 Ultra (see issue 111, p73). Testing DirectX 9 abilities by isolating 3DMark03's Mother Nature test, the V8 pulled in only 12.1fps against the 18.5fps and 16.6fps of ATi and nVidia respectively. It did pull ahead in Unreal Tournament with anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering on maximum, but these results aren't directly comparable, since the card can currently only manage a maximum of 4x anisotropic filtering, as opposed to the 8x of ATi and nVidia.

The major factor to consider when looking at these results is that they were obtained using first-generation drivers. The ability of drivers to affect overall performance is huge, so future revisions could see XGI begin to close the gap. XGI's predictions for the performance of the Duo are encouraging, though, as the company claims a boost of around 60 per cent over the V8 Ultra. If true, that would see the Duo pulling ahead in most tests. The company has a newer version of the V8 on the way, sporting DDR2 RAM: when it arrives later this year, the hardware itself will be faster and the drivers may be more mature. A lot depends on pricing of course, but when we spoke to XGI it quoted approximate prices for the V8 in excess of what you'd expect to pay for a 9600 XT or FX 5700 Ultra.

While its claims of a graphics revolution are a severe overstatement, XGI has got off to a moderately good start: coming from absolutely nowhere and producing performance that isn't utterly dire is to be applauded. If we were ATi or nVidia, we wouldn't be losing a massive amount of sleep, but we'd certainly be keeping a close eye on the young pretenders to the graphics throne.

Author: David Fearon

1 2
Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Graphics cards Reviews
AMD Radeon HD 7950 review

AMD Radeon HD 7950

Category: Graphics cards
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £340
AMD Radeon HD 7970 review

AMD Radeon HD 7970

Category: Graphics cards
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £432
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 review

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560

Category: Graphics cards
Rating: 3 out of 6
Price: £169
AMD Radeon HD 6790 review

AMD Radeon HD 6790

Category: Graphics cards
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £105
Nvidia GeForce GTX 590 review

Nvidia GeForce GTX 590

Category: Graphics cards
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £570
Compare reviews: Graphics cards

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
More From PC Pro
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.