Skip to navigation

Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 review


Nvidia’s first 28nm card blows the competition away on performance, efficiency and price, and steals AMD’s high-end crown

Review Date: 21 Mar 2012

Reviewed By: Mike Jennings

Price when reviewed: £358 (£430 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
6 stars out of 6

Features & Design
6 stars out of 6

Value for Money
5 stars out of 6

6 stars out of 6


AMD was first out of the gates with 28nm, but every Radeon HD 7000 Series card we’ve so far reviewed has come with a big caveat: wait and see what Nvidia does. Now the first 28nm “Kepler” chip is in our Labs, we can safely say we hope you heeded that advice – Kepler was worth the wait.

The GeForce GTX 680 is Nvidia’s new single-core flagship card, tweaked, refined and renamed from the “Fermi” architecture first launched with the GTX 480 in 2010. Graphics Processing Clusters, or GPCs, still form the building blocks of the new GPU, with each having its own resources for shaders, textures and compute processing. Each pair of GPCs shares a memory controller, but L2 cache is shared between all of the card’s GPCs.

While the GTX 480 and GTX 580 made do with 15 and then 16 GPCs, each with 32 stream processors, Nvidia is using only eight clusters on the GTX 680, each boasting 192 stream processors. That’s a huge increase, and closer to the 2,048 stream processors AMD includes in its flagship Radeon HD 7970.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

Nvidia’s biggest new feature is something you won’t find on any AMD card: GPU Boost. With a nod to Intel’s Turbo Boost, it dynamically adjusts the core clock from the stock 1,006MHz depending on the operating conditions – ours idled at 549MHz, for example. When performance is required it adjusts the core every millisecond to try to hit the 195W power draw ceiling – ours rose to 1,097MHz. Nvidia claims this constant power draw makes for a more reliable card, as it’s fluctuations in draw, rather than a high level, that harm reliability.

The card has 2GB of GDDR5 memory running at 6,008MHz – almost twice the speed of the Radeon HD 7970 – but the 256-bit memory bus is narrower. The transistor count of 3.5 billion is slightly less than the 4.3 billion on the AMD card, but the GTX 680’s texture fillrate of 128.8GT/sec is higher than the 118.4GT/sec of the HD 7970.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

That strength translates to strong benchmark results. In Crysis at 1,920 x 1,080 and Very High settings the GTX 680 averaged 70fps, 2fps ahead of the HD 7970. Both cards returned the same result at 2,560 x 1,600 – a playable 42fps.

The GTX 680 smashed the AMD card in Crysis 2. At 1,920 x 1,080 and Ultra settings – the toughest the game offers – it averaged 57fps, with the HD 7970 on 36fps. There was a sizeable gap when we upped the resolution, too, with the scores at 33fps and 26fps.

1 2
Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here
User comments

It's about time...

Assuming I can get my hands on one any time soon, I shall be purchasing one of these for my new ivy bridge build. Thankfully me putting off buying AMD was worth waiting for.

By David1981 on 22 Mar 2012

What a strange review

One benchmark of a 4 year old game where you compare it to a 3 year old budget level graphics card.

Biased much?

By Cynewulf on 22 Mar 2012

GPGPU Performance issue

What worries me is according to annantech the GPGPU performance Suffers.I use Octane Render which is programmed to use Cuda.I suspect this card will likely bomb at that.I'm Waiting on someone on the Octane Forum to get one and compare it to the 580.

By Jaberwocky on 22 Mar 2012

What a strange comment


Crisis, Crisis 2, Just Cause 2, Dirt 3, TessMark tessellation benchmark, ShaderToyMark and 3DMark 11. In all tests it was compared to AMD's latest top-of-the-range card.

By Mark_Thompson on 22 Mar 2012


Yeah I think @Cynewulf was reading a different review

By TimoGunt on 22 Mar 2012


can you tell me how power consumption and operating temperature compare to a GTX560 Ti?

By revsorg on 23 Mar 2012

Its mentioned in the review


Power consumption and temps are shown in the review.

By curiousclive on 25 Mar 2012

800 000 000 is Slightly Less!!!

"The transistor count of 3.5 billion is slightly less than the 4.3 billion on the AMD" Has anybody in PcPro done some maths? It's 0.8 billion, "slightly" less than 1 billion.

By pasma1 on 29 Mar 2012


I posted it only once. What happened here?

By pasma1 on 29 Mar 2012


Is the A-list dead? If it were alive would this be on it?

By dougtmurphy on 24 May 2012


How can this still be on the A List almost 2 years on?

By majidalborz on 11 Dec 2013

and still...

2 1/2 years later it is still there! Unless products are continually reviewed, the term A-List should not be used.

By knockout25 on 11 Oct 2014

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.


Latest Category Reviews
Compare reviews: Graphics cards


Most Commented Reviews
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing


Sponsored Links


Your email:

Your password:

remember me


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.