Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti review
Offers all the power you need to play the latest titles at high resolutions, yet the price remains reasonable
Review Date: 25 Jan 2011
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: £166 (£199 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
Nvidia’s high-end GTX 580 and 570 cards both received Recommended awards, with the latter currently sitting proudly atop the A List. The next card down the scale, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti, aims to stretch that success into the mid-range.
It doesn’t stray far from its older brothers. The GF114 core is a reworking of the GF110, and its changes echo those made to last year’s GTX 460. Key among these is the reorganisation of the core’s stream processors: instead of the GTX 580’s four and the GTX 570’s three Graphics Processing Clusters (GPCs) with 32 stream processors each, the GTX 560 Ti uses two 48-strong GPCs.
Elsewhere, there’s 1.9 billion of Nvidia’s new variable-speed transistors – down from the 3 billion in the GTX 580 – and a core clocked at an impressive 822MHz. The shader clock is a very high 1,640MHz, and the 1GB of GDDR5 memory runs at 4,000MHz.
The combination of higher clock speeds, reorganised stream processors and efficient transistors pushed the GTX 560 Ti to some fine benchmark scores. It averaged 40fps in our 1,920 x 1,080 Very High quality Crysis test. That’s 8fps behind the GTX 570, and only 3fps behind the Radeon HD 6950, which costs around £30 exc VAT more.
The GTX 560 Ti also managed 32fps when we added 8x anti-aliasing, before going on to deliver stonking scores in our Just Cause 2 tests. An average of 65fps in the 1,920 x 1,080 Very High test with 8x anti-aliasing is almost 20fps faster than the Radeon HD 6950.
There’s plenty of overclocking headroom. We used MSI’s free Afterburner utility to tweak the card, quickly improving its base clock from 820MHz to 960MHz, and the memory clock from 4,000MHz to 4,320MHz. The results were palpable: 45fps in our 1,920 x 1,080 Very High quality Crysis benchmark, more than 10% faster than at stock speeds. It’s an encouraging sign, and we wouldn’t be surprised to see board partners releasing models with even higher clock speeds.
The GTX 560 Ti stayed cool and quiet during our tests, with an idle temperature of 43°C that rose to 78°C during our stress tests. It’s just a shame it isn’t quite as efficient when it comes to power draw: a peak of 331W for our whole test rig is lower than the GTX 580, but both the Radeon HD 6950 and HD 6970 required less power.
Where this card really scores, however, is in the pricing. At £166 exc VAT, it’s far cheaper than its rivals: AMD’s Radeon HD 6950 and HD 6970 cost around £195 and £230 respectively, and a GTX 570 will set you back at least £230. The £170 HD 6870 performs similarly but boasts nothing like the same overclocking headroom.
The GTX 560 Ti, then, is a triumph: virtually as fast as more expensive rivals, and with scope for even better performance with a bit of tweaking. Under the hood it shares plenty with the GTX 460 – and it looks likely to repeat its predecessor’s success.
Author: Mike Jennings
You can get cheaper overclocked versions of this card.A Must buy for the budget guru.
By reo1471 on 6 Apr 2011
Why oh why are all review based on gaming ?
I dont do gaming,I just want info on 2D graphics performance in image editing,Is that really too much to ask
By UK_Snapper on 15 Jun 2011
Image editing and 2D graphics work (think Photoshop or Illustrator type software use) relies mainly on processor and memory. It hardly touches the GPU apart from actually displaying the stuff on screen so there wouldn't be much point in benchmarking it as there is practically nothing to benchmark. 3D work (like using 3ds Max) again is mainly reliant on CPU and memory for actual rendering of images/video and only uses the GPU to display stuff on screen but it is more dependent on it than a 2D program like Photoshop or Illustrator.
So that'd be why the reviews are based on gaming... they do more with the GPU than anything else.
By mred2000 on 22 Aug 2011
I got the asus GTX560 Ti whilst doing a rebuild, it has taken every game I have thrown at it and never flinched ie:- Battlefield 3 CoD 3and4 Mass Effect 1,2 and 3
By superboot on 23 Aug 2012
- Europol warns: public Wi-Fi isn't safe
- Privacy groups challenge Facebook's WhatsApp buy
- IDC: iPad intertia opens door for Windows tablets
- Chip breakthrough to eliminate checkout queues
- Rivals put on notice as Spotify snaps up The Echo Nest
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 leaks via Microsoft's website
- Bitcoin "founder" says: you've got the wrong man
- Has bitcoin creator been found?
- HTC Desire 310: more competition for the Moto G
- Mozilla questions why Dell charges £16 to install Firefox
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Old-school internet scams: five that just won't die
- Bitcoin believers not worried by Mt. Gox disarray
- How to hack your car
- Small server vs cloud: which is best for SMBs?
- Block party: why do millions play Minecraft?
- What to do if you’re still on Windows XP
- Microsoft Word: top 20 secret features
- Measuring me: is your body the future of security?
- The best mobile apps for business
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book
- 1.6TB SSD: why would you need one?