Nvidia Fermi GF100 review
Holds a small performance edge over ATI's latest, but Fermi's real strengths may be wasted on gamers
Review Date: 26 Mar 2010
Reviewed By: David Bayon
Price when reviewed:
Nvidia's Fermi graphics cards were officially unveiled in September 2009, but in truth we've been waiting a good deal longer than that. It's the manufacturer's first major architecture since the GT200 back in 2008, and a series of delays has seen ATI enjoy an unchallenged run at gamers' wallets.
We'd heard hints of just how advanced the new GF100 architecture would be, with up to 512 stream processors, a 40nm fabrication process and 3.2 billion transistors. Now it's finally here, we can start to figure out for ourselves just how powerful - and, as we'll see, power hungry - Fermi is.
First things first: that target of 512 stream processors hasn't been hit in either of the first two releases. The GeForce GTX 480 has 480 of them, along with a 700MHz core clock and 1.5GB of GDDR5 memory with a 384-bit memory interface. The lesser GTX 470 has 448 stream processors, a 607MHz clock and 1.25GB of memory with a 320-bit memory interface. Nvidia is keen to stress the headroom available within the architecture, so it's likely we'll see that higher model at some point.
If you're looking for Core i7 levels of instant domination, you're in the wrong place - Fermi may be a new architecture but it isn't going to flip the graphics card market on its head overnight. In fact, the first two cards are very close in both physical size and gaming performance to ATI's Radeon HD 5870 and 5850.
We ran benchmarks in a variety of current titles and, on the whole, the Fermi cards narrowly outperformed their ATI equivalents. In Crysis at 1,920 x 1,200 and Very High settings, the GTX 480 averaged 40fps to the HD 5870's 38fps; the GTX 470 scored 33fps to the HD 5850's 32fps. Higher settings saw similar margins. World in Conflict had the two Nvidia cards consistently ahead by just under 20%, and in Stalker: Call of Pripyat that margin was around 5%. Other games had ATI's cards ahead by a whisker, and if we average all the results, Nvidia's edge looks to be between 5% and 10%.
But the most interesting of all Fermi's specifications is its power consumption: Nvidia puts the GTX 470 at 215W and the GTX 480 at a massive 250W. With each card successively installed, our test rig idled at 131W and 204W respectively; when stress-tested with FurMark those figures shot up to 380W and 406W. Compare that to a peak of just 267W with ATI's fastest single-GPU card installed, and you'll get an idea of just how hungry Fermi is. The GTX 480's core also reached a scorching 98°C, and during games you'll have to put up with a noise like a CD drive permanently whirring into action.
Stream Processor Count
Pure speculation, but it looks like they have a process yield issue. 480 is 32 short of 512 and 448 is 32 less again. Is it that they are building chips with 512 stream processors and disabling blocks of 32 during test to get working parts?
By milliganp on 29 Mar 2010
They're unverified rumours for now, but we've heard similar talk from various sources. I guess we'll find out when they go on sale next week - don't be surprised if the GTX 480 is in short supply.
By DavidBayon on 29 Mar 2010
I was thinking exactly the same and AnandTech seems to confirm it:
"...GF100 is a 512 SP/core part organized in a 4x16x32 fashion, but these first parts will not have all of GF100’s functional units activated. Instead we’ll be getting a 480 core part for the GTX 480, and a 448 core part for the GTX 470. Ultimately we will not be seeing the full power of GF100 right away..."
for more info see here:
By stasi47 on 29 Mar 2010
ITLeader says the following:
"...one full SM is disabled. It’s uncertain whether this is because of yield problems. Even using a 40nm process, the GTX 480 chip is massive. Alternatively, Nvidia may have disabled an SM because of power issues ..."
By stasi47 on 29 Mar 2010
- Europol warns: public Wi-Fi isn't safe
- Privacy groups challenge Facebook's WhatsApp buy
- IDC: iPad intertia opens door for Windows tablets
- Chip breakthrough to eliminate checkout queues
- Rivals put on notice as Spotify snaps up The Echo Nest
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 leaks via Microsoft's website
- Bitcoin "founder" says: you've got the wrong man
- Has bitcoin creator been found?
- HTC Desire 310: more competition for the Moto G
- Mozilla questions why Dell charges £16 to install Firefox
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Old-school internet scams: five that just won't die
- Bitcoin believers not worried by Mt. Gox disarray
- How to hack your car
- Small server vs cloud: which is best for SMBs?
- Block party: why do millions play Minecraft?
- What to do if you’re still on Windows XP
- Microsoft Word: top 20 secret features
- Measuring me: is your body the future of security?
- The best mobile apps for business
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book
- 1.6TB SSD: why would you need one?