ATI Radeon HD 5830 review
in Graphics cards
Verdict
Average performance, a high price and even higher power draw make this a GPU to avoid
Review Date: 25 Feb 2010
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: £170 (£200 inc VAT)
Buy it now for: £180
(see more store prices)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
ATI’s Cypress core may have been used to power the HD 5870 – the most powerful single-chip card we’ve seen – but the chip’s true versatility is now coming to the fore. We’ve already seen a cut-down version powering the HD 5850, and now it forms the basis of the new HD 5830 – ATI's cheapest top-end card.
The specification, naturally, is very close to those other two cards. The HD 5830's GPU is built using the same 40nm manufacturing process, and it boasts the same 2,154 million transistors. It supports ATI's EyeFinity technology too, essentially allowing your PC to treat a multi-monitor setup as a single, large screen.
Physically, it's the same as its brothers too. It's weighty and, at 293mm in length, we’d be wary about fitting it into even medium-sized cases. But there is one subtle difference: while the HD 5830 still requires two six-pin plugs, they’re on the top edge of the card rather than at the rear, in one of the two Batmobile-style vents.
Oddly, given the lower version number, it boasts a higher core clock speed than the HD 5850, running 50MHz faster at 800MHz. But the number of stream processors makes more sense, with 1,120 here compared with the HD 5850's 1,440.
The level of performance is as expected too. In our low and medium-quality Crysis tests, run at resolutions of 1,024 x 768 and 1,200 x 1,024, it returned results of 132fps and 85fps respectively, with the latter result three frames behind the HD 5850.
The gap widened in our more demanding benchmarks. In the High quality, 1,600 x 1,200 test, the HD 5830 scored 48fps – eight frames behind the HD 5850. This gulf was evident in the Very High benchmarks too: when we ran this test at 1,600 x 1,200, the HD 5830 was five frames behind, and four frames behind when we upped the resolution to 1,920 x 1,200.
The HD 5830 drew an unusual amount of power too. In our test rig (an MSI X58 Platinum motherboard, Intel Core i7-920 processor and 6GB of RAM) the idle HD 5830 contributed to a power draw of 155W and a peak draw of 284W. The HD 5850, in contrast, used 122W when idle and just 231W at peak; even the HD 5870 used only 252W at full load.
This would all be fine if the card was a lot cheaper than the HD 5850, but it isn't. In fact, without a significant price cut, the £22 price differential just isn't big enough to justify choosing the HD 5830.
Author: Mike Jennings
Best Prices
Price comparison powered by 
| Prices, delivery and availability at 3 retailers | Go | |
|
£180 | Go |
|
£183 | Go |
|
£202 | Go |
From around the web
Score doesn't agree with verdict
If "this a GPU to avoid" how come it got 4/6 overall?
By Peter_Tennant on 25 Feb 2010 ![]()
Has the score been changed? To me, it says it only scored 3/6 overall.
By pbryanw on 25 Feb 2010 ![]()
A terrible price just for DX11
An expensive card when most £200 cards are gaming cards. Even my old 4870 is better value at £130 for price/performance or pay an extra £40 for the 5850. Even the 5850 price were pushed up because of this needless 5830 budget card.
A case of DX11 being a premium on Ati cards.
By champmanfan2 on 4 Mar 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- LinkedIn revenue doubles as membership soars
- Kodak kills off cameras
- UK broadband project spending £1m on legal fees
- Microsoft: Windows on ARM won't be sold separately
- Intel pays five hours of profits to settle antitrust case
- Windows 8 on ARM to run desktop apps... but only Office
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Data boost bolsters Vodafone revenue
- Google working on cloud storage system
- Lenovo's profit leaps 54% on market gains
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement






