ATI Radeon HD 5830 review
Average performance, a high price and even higher power draw make this a GPU to avoid
Review Date: 25 Feb 2010
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: £170 (£200 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
ATI’s Cypress core may have been used to power the HD 5870 – the most powerful single-chip card we’ve seen – but the chip’s true versatility is now coming to the fore. We’ve already seen a cut-down version powering the HD 5850, and now it forms the basis of the new HD 5830 – ATI's cheapest top-end card.
The specification, naturally, is very close to those other two cards. The HD 5830's GPU is built using the same 40nm manufacturing process, and it boasts the same 2,154 million transistors. It supports ATI's EyeFinity technology too, essentially allowing your PC to treat a multi-monitor setup as a single, large screen.
Physically, it's the same as its brothers too. It's weighty and, at 293mm in length, we’d be wary about fitting it into even medium-sized cases. But there is one subtle difference: while the HD 5830 still requires two six-pin plugs, they’re on the top edge of the card rather than at the rear, in one of the two Batmobile-style vents.
Oddly, given the lower version number, it boasts a higher core clock speed than the HD 5850, running 50MHz faster at 800MHz. But the number of stream processors makes more sense, with 1,120 here compared with the HD 5850's 1,440.
The level of performance is as expected too. In our low and medium-quality Crysis tests, run at resolutions of 1,024 x 768 and 1,200 x 1,024, it returned results of 132fps and 85fps respectively, with the latter result three frames behind the HD 5850.
The gap widened in our more demanding benchmarks. In the High quality, 1,600 x 1,200 test, the HD 5830 scored 48fps – eight frames behind the HD 5850. This gulf was evident in the Very High benchmarks too: when we ran this test at 1,600 x 1,200, the HD 5830 was five frames behind, and four frames behind when we upped the resolution to 1,920 x 1,200.
The HD 5830 drew an unusual amount of power too. In our test rig (an MSI X58 Platinum motherboard, Intel Core i7-920 processor and 6GB of RAM) the idle HD 5830 contributed to a power draw of 155W and a peak draw of 284W. The HD 5850, in contrast, used 122W when idle and just 231W at peak; even the HD 5870 used only 252W at full load.
This would all be fine if the card was a lot cheaper than the HD 5850, but it isn't. In fact, without a significant price cut, the £22 price differential just isn't big enough to justify choosing the HD 5830.
Author: Mike Jennings
Score doesn't agree with verdict
If "this a GPU to avoid" how come it got 4/6 overall?
By Peter_Tennant on 25 Feb 2010
Has the score been changed? To me, it says it only scored 3/6 overall.
By pbryanw on 25 Feb 2010
A terrible price just for DX11
An expensive card when most £200 cards are gaming cards. Even my old 4870 is better value at £130 for price/performance or pay an extra £40 for the 5850. Even the 5850 price were pushed up because of this needless 5830 budget card.
A case of DX11 being a premium on Ati cards.
By champmanfan2 on 4 Mar 2010
- What's on this week's PC Pro podcast?
- Apple patent reveals iPhone car control system
- Windows 10 release date, features and how to get the Technical Preview
- Microsoft updates Windows 10 tech preview
- End of an era: Nokia Lumia to become Microsoft Lumia
- Google boosts secure logins with USB Security Key
- Nominations now open for UK Cloud Awards 2015
- Lenovo rumoured to be acquiring BlackBerry
- Apple releases iOS 8.1 with Apple Pay
- Microsoft offers cloud access to help fight Ebola
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- iPad Air 2 vs Nexus 9: Apple and Google's latest high-end tablets compared
- Five things that are actually new in the iPad Air 2
- Bendgate, Antennagate, and why Apple doesn’t care about bad news
- iPad Air 2 and iPad mini 3 release date, specs and UK price rumours
- Office Online vs Google Docs: which free online office suite is best?
- iPhone 6 Plus vs iPhone 6 design comparison
- How to speed up an Android smartphone
- Nexus 6 release date, specs, UK price and leaked images
- iPhone 6 vs iPhone 6 Plus screen comparison
- Mac OS X Yosemite release date, price and new features
- How to sell more ebooks on Amazon
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office