ATI Radeon HD 5570 review
in Graphics cards
Verdict
Looks good on paper, but it's not great value for money.
Review Date: 9 Feb 2010
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: £62 (£73 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
We experienced a strange sense of déjà vu when we first came across ATI’s Radeon HD 5570. It shares the same diminutive PCB as ATI’s recently released HD 5450 media card – but a quick look at its specifications shows it has more in common with the mid-range HD 5670.
It uses the same "Redwood" core as that card, and so the same number of stream processors at 400. In some ways it's superior, with double the RAM at 1,024MB, but in others it lags behind, using only GDDR3 to the HD 5670's GDDR5, and a slightly slower core clock speed at 650MHz to the HD 5670's 725MHz.
That's doesn't hold it back, though, and the card put in a very impressive showing in our tests. As expected, performance in the Low-quality Crysis test was good at 116fps, and it coped well with the Medium-quality test too, returning a perfectly playable 45fps. That's very good, but not as fast as its main rival, which returned a frame rate 13fps faster. This trend continued in the High quality Crysis test, the HD 5570 scoring 18fps, to the HD 5670's 25fps.
In our World in Conflict tests the card averaged 134fps and 74fps at low and medium-quality settings respectively, and produced a near-playable score of 24fps at high quality settings, suggesting that modern games aren’t beyond the reach of the HD 5570 as long as you tone down some of the more intensive graphical options.
It proved adept with media files, the GPU needing only 20% of its power to decode 1080p Blu-ray flawlessly. And that’s not the end of the HD 5570’s charms, either. With such a small PCB it’ll fit into the most cramped cases and its small fan doesn't make a lot of noise either. The HD 5570 is also frugal: our test rig’s peak power consumption of 169W was 5W lower than that required by the HD 5670.
The 5570 has one big problem, however, and that's the price. Although its specification and slower performance suggest it sits below the HD 5670 in ATI's line-up, it'll cost you about the same. And when that card offers more grunt, there’s little reason to choose the HD 5570 instead.
Author: Mike Jennings
From around the web
I'm assuming the article title is wrong (i.e. 5770 vs. 5570)?
By piphil on 9 Feb 2010 ![]()
Name
Hi piphil - thanks for pointing that out. We've now changed the name of the card to ATI Radeon HD 5570 which is, of course, the correct one :)
By Mikey_Jennings on 9 Feb 2010 ![]()
Fraser
I thought something was wrong, I run a 5770 and while it is no beast it offers decent value for a DX11 card
By Socrates on 10 Feb 2010 ![]()
Hasn't "World in Conflict" been banned by the YouTube toddler filter?
By Steve_Cassidy on 11 Feb 2010 ![]()
So how does it compare to the top of the range ATI card from say 2 years ago. This is actually quite an important question, if you think about it, and holds true for every generation/generation jump card. Is a lower range card today, a better bet than a top range card from 2-3 years ago.
By alan_lj on 11 Feb 2010 ![]()
Poor context of review
One has got to remember that for low profile PCs this is about the best card you are likely to find for the next year or so and one of the only offering Direct X 11. Because it is low profile it should not be primarily compared with a full height 5670. Compared with previous low profile cards such as the 4550 and 5450, this card tops them all by a significant margin according to all major benchmarking sites. Also progress has been made over the 4 series bringing DirectX ll and Eyefinity plus increase in clock speeds over the 5450. In this context it is an awesome card. In context of mainstream gaming, no, but then this will not be used for that really.
By amhoyle1 on 15 Feb 2010 ![]()
ATI Radeon HD 5570
i have this graphics card and have no problems at all with it. i get great quality and realy fast gameplay and video playback its also smooth and very very good
By jackmadge on 30 Apr 2011 ![]()
advertisement
- LinkedIn revenue doubles as membership soars
- Kodak kills off cameras
- UK broadband project spending £1m on legal fees
- Microsoft: Windows on ARM won't be sold separately
- Intel pays five hours of profits to settle antitrust case
- Windows 8 on ARM to run desktop apps... but only Office
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Data boost bolsters Vodafone revenue
- Google working on cloud storage system
- Lenovo's profit leaps 54% on market gains
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement






