Skip to navigation

ATI Radeon HD 5670

in Graphics cards

ATI Radeon HD 5670

Verdict

Quicker than its predecessor but no more expensive, it's ideal for a versatile media centre

Review Date: 14 Jan 2010

Price when reviewed: £61 (£72 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
5 stars out of 6

Features & Design
5 stars out of 6

Value for Money
5 stars out of 6

Performance
4 stars out of 6

ATI’s “sweet spot strategy” has become a familiar tactic since the June 2008 release of the Radeon HD 4000 series. The firm’s concentration on fast and affordable parts has given it the edge over Nvidia, particularly given the latter's almost total lack of activity on the desktop. ATI’s latest card, the Radeon HD 5670, looks to continue this run of success.

It may be the smallest and cheapest HD 5000-series card yet, but its specification suggests that it can still pack a punch. As with the rest of the range, the HD 5670 is built on a 40nm die, and the 775MHz core clock is actually faster than three other GPUs in the HD 5000 series. DirectX 11 is also supported.

In some areas, though, the HD 5670 understandably lags behind: there are only 400 stream processors compared to the 720 included in the HD 5750, and the 512MB of GDDR5 RAM is clocked at 1,000MHz, which is slower than most other parts in ATI’s current line-up. ATI does promise that a 1GB version is on the way.

ATI Radeon HD 5670

Nevertheless, the diminutive HD 5670 still produced decent benchmark results. It romped through our Low-quality Crysis test, and delivered a score of 58fps – 8fps faster than its predecessor, the HD 4670 – in the 1,280 x 1,024 Medium benchmark. Intensive settings proved too much, though. In our 1,600 x 1,200 High test, the card scored just 25fps. This puts it behind the Radeon HD 4770, which has been our A-Listed value card for close to a year.

Performance was better in World in Conflict, where the HD 5670 returned a playable score of 34fps in the High-quality benchmark. However, it couldn’t handle the game’s very high settings, running at just 24fps.

As well as being a solid gaming chip, the HD 5670 is also well-suited for media centre systems: it’s more than capable of decoding 1080p video, it’s as small as the HD 4670, and the single-height cooler isn’t particularly loud. It also boasts HDMI and DisplayPort outputs alongside the usual DVI-I.

The card - which needs no external power connector - also proved frugal. Our test rig drew 116W when idle, which is broadly in line with the rest of ATI's latest cards, and the HD 5670's peak power draw of 175W meant that it was the only HD 5000-series GPU to not push our test rig behind a 200W power draw. It's worth bearing in mind, though, that the older HD 4770 drew just 164W.

It’s worth bearing in mind that ATI’s board partners will be releasing passively-cooled models in the near future. Also, the card could be overkill if games are of less importance to you than Blu-ray, in which case you'd be better off with the tiny Radeon HD 4350, which handles HD content perfectly well at half the price.

The bigger HD 4770 is still our card of choice for gamers on a budget, but if you’re looking for something more discreet, sacrificing too much performance, the HD 5670 is an impressive compromise. It's a low-profile GPU with added gaming grunt, and it betters its predecessor at no extra expense.

Author: Mike Jennings

User comments

Power consumption idle/active?
'
Measured noise levels?

By phantombudgie on 14 Jan 2010

Power consumption

Phantombudgie - we've added the information about power consumption to the review. With regards to noise levels, we don't have the facilities available to test cards down to the last decibel, but we didn't notice the HSF as particularly loud during our testing. We'd still recommend waiting for a passive card if you need silence, though.

By Mikey_Jennings on 14 Jan 2010

stokegabriel

I don't know anybody that runs a 1600 x 1200 screen. That was a standard for 20" CRT monitors mainly, most lcd flat panel monitors would run 1680 x 1080 or full HD. Since the frame rate for a 1600 x 1200 monitor is just unplayable, I can't help wondering if this would just make the grade with a 1680 x 1080 screen?

By stokegabriel on 15 Jan 2010

Don't waste your cash on ATI for HTPC \ Media Centre

I'm sure its a great card, and wouod be wonderful in a suitable machine. Unfortunately if that machine is to be used for watching BBC HD FORGET IT!

NO ATI card (or embedded chipset) can currently display live BBC HD owing to a strange Hardware \ OS \ Firmware \ Driver problem.

PC Pro has covered this in the past and there's a big thread here:
http://thegreenbutton.com/forums/t/73544.aspx?Page
Index=1

By wittgenfrog on 19 Jan 2010

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Compare reviews: Graphics cards

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.