ATI Radeon HD 5770 review
in Graphics cards
Verdict
Next-gen technology but a surprisingly modest performance gain for the price
Review Date: 13 Oct 2009
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: £111 (£128 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
ATI graphics cards follow a familiar pattern: both the Radeon HD 4870 and HD 5870 introduced new architectures with high-end performance, and were then followed by more affordable mainstream parts. Back then the Radeon HD 4770 won awards for its balance of performance and price, and now the HD 5770 hopes to tread the same ground.
The hardware certainly looks promising, using a 40nm GPU with a core clock speed of 850MHz that outstrips almost all 4000-series parts. The 1GB of GDD5 memory, clocked at 1,200MHz, is also around the fastest on the market. With 800 stream processors it matches the top-end 4000-series parts — though the 5870 has twice as many.
Like all 5000-series GPUs, the HD 5770 supports DirectX 11 and ATI’s multi-monitor Eyefinity system. The card offers two DVI-I outputs as well as HDMI and DisplayPort sockets – and only requires one 6-pin power plug.
In our Crysis benchmarks the HD 5770 proved a strong contender. At 1,600 x 1,200 and high quality, it returned a result of 41fps – only a single frame slower than the HD 4870, which was ATI’s flagship card for most of last year.
Only when we raised the resolution to 1,920 x 1,200 and set Crysis’ graphical effects to their highest level, did the HD 5770 drop to a choppy 22fps. With this level of detail we could achieve a playable framerate only by lowering the resolution to 1,280 x 1,024 – on the low side for serious gamers.
Still, the HD 5770 compares well to Nvidia’s current offerings. The GeForce GTX 260 core 216 costs around £25 more but ran just two frames quicker in our high-quality Crysis benchmark, and was one frame slower with very high quality settings.
Also worth mentioning is the power draw which, like the HD 5870, is surprisingly low. When tested with our Core-i7 test rig, the HD 5770 drew 117W when idle, with this figure rising to 204W as the card churned through our most demanding benchmarks - almost 50W less than the HD 5870 needed at peak levels.
But compared to the HD 5870, which doubled the performance of its predecessor, the 5770 seems a modest step up. It’s not hard to imagine that Nvidia’s new cards – when they finally arrive – could offer better value.
Indeed, ATI’s old HD 4870 costs the same as the 5770, and offers comparable performance. If that card falls in price any further, it could be a smart alternative. It doesn’t support DirectX 11, but it will be a long time before most games require that technology.
In all, the Radeon HD 5770 is a good performer at a tempting price, but hardly a hands-down winner with last-generation cards matching it at similar prices. It may be worth waiting to see what happens next before you invest.
Author: Mike Jennings
From around the web
The 4870 may be similar in price/performance but is there a gain to be had in terms of power-requirements and heat/noise from going with the 40nm 5770? This is becoming an important consideration for lots of people fed up with having to turn the volume up full on their PC's just to drown out the sound of all the fans.
By Bassey1976 on 13 Oct 2009 ![]()
Power draw
Bassey - thanks for your comment. We've added in power figures to our review and, as you can see, the HD 5770 compares favourably with the HD 5870 and well with most other cards on the market, too - hopefully this helps!
By Mikey_Jennings on 13 Oct 2009 ![]()
sapphire radeon 5770 flex edition
what about a review of the above which is said to have better cooling
By willhous on 27 Aug 2010 ![]()
AIT CrossFireX
What's better: performance, cost, 2 x HD5770 (£120 each) using CrossFireX or single HD5850 (£220) or HD5870 (£300)?
By skywalker on 12 Sep 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- LinkedIn revenue doubles as membership soars
- Kodak kills off cameras
- UK broadband project spending £1m on legal fees
- Microsoft: Windows on ARM won't be sold separately
- Intel pays five hours of profits to settle antitrust case
- Windows 8 on ARM to run desktop apps... but only Office
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Data boost bolsters Vodafone revenue
- Google working on cloud storage system
- Lenovo's profit leaps 54% on market gains
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement





