ATI Radeon HD 5770
in Graphics cards
Verdict
Next-gen technology but a surprisingly modest performance gain for the price
Review Date: 13 Oct 2009
Price when reviewed: £111 (£128 inc VAT)
Buy it now for: £131.80
Overall Rating

Features & Design

Value for Money

Performance

ATI graphics cards follow a familiar pattern: both the Radeon HD 4870 and HD 5870 introduced new architectures with high-end performance, and were then followed by more affordable mainstream parts. Back then the Radeon HD 4770 won awards for its balance of performance and price, and now the HD 5770 hopes to tread the same ground.
The hardware certainly looks promising, using a 40nm GPU with a core clock speed of 850MHz that outstrips almost all 4000-series parts. The 1GB of GDD5 memory, clocked at 1,200MHz, is also around the fastest on the market. With 800 stream processors it matches the top-end 4000-series parts — though the 5870 has twice as many.
Like all 5000-series GPUs, the HD 5770 supports DirectX 11 and ATI’s multi-monitor Eyefinity system. The card offers two DVI-I outputs as well as HDMI and DisplayPort sockets – and only requires one 6-pin power plug.
In our Crysis benchmarks the HD 5770 proved a strong contender. At 1,600 x 1,200 and high quality, it returned a result of 41fps – only a single frame slower than the HD 4870, which was ATI’s flagship card for most of last year.
Only when we raised the resolution to 1,920 x 1,200 and set Crysis’ graphical effects to their highest level, did the HD 5770 drop to a choppy 22fps. With this level of detail we could achieve a playable framerate only by lowering the resolution to 1,280 x 1,024 – on the low side for serious gamers.
Still, the HD 5770 compares well to Nvidia’s current offerings. The GeForce GTX 260 core 216 costs around £25 more but ran just two frames quicker in our high-quality Crysis benchmark, and was one frame slower with very high quality settings.
Also worth mentioning is the power draw which, like the HD 5870, is surprisingly low. When tested with our Core-i7 test rig, the HD 5770 drew 117W when idle, with this figure rising to 204W as the card churned through our most demanding benchmarks - almost 50W less than the HD 5870 needed at peak levels.
But compared to the HD 5870, which doubled the performance of its predecessor, the 5770 seems a modest step up. It’s not hard to imagine that Nvidia’s new cards – when they finally arrive – could offer better value.
Indeed, ATI’s old HD 4870 costs the same as the 5770, and offers comparable performance. If that card falls in price any further, it could be a smart alternative. It doesn’t support DirectX 11, but it will be a long time before most games require that technology.
In all, the Radeon HD 5770 is a good performer at a tempting price, but hardly a hands-down winner with last-generation cards matching it at similar prices. It may be worth waiting to see what happens next before you invest.
Author: Mike Jennings
The 4870 may be similar in price/performance but is there a gain to be had in terms of power-requirements and heat/noise from going with the 40nm 5770? This is becoming an important consideration for lots of people fed up with having to turn the volume up full on their PC's just to drown out the sound of all the fans.
By Bassey1976 on 13 Oct 2009 
Power draw
Bassey - thanks for your comment. We've added in power figures to our review and, as you can see, the HD 5770 compares favourably with the HD 5870 and well with most other cards on the market, too - hopefully this helps!
By Mikey_Jennings on 13 Oct 2009 
Latest Prices for Radeon HD 5770
| Seller | Price | Buy Now | Seller Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
£131.80 | Shop |
3390 reviews |
advertisement
- Can Palm stay alive?
- Security expert breaks into TV star's Facebook account
- Government puts biologist in charge of broadband
- Viacom accused of polluting YouTube
- HP censured over faulty laptops
- Palm "deeply disappointed" by financial results
- Windows 7 SP1 to deliver "minor tweaks"
- Facebook draws line under Beacon debacle
- Windows 7 XP Mode now runs on all processors
- Browser ballot "boosts Opera downloads by 85%"
- What's that eggy smell in the server room?
- How to change the default template in Word 2007
- Book review: Rework by Jason Fried and David Heinemeier Hansson
- Panorama parents deserve their file-sharing fine
- Google and BT offer free website service to British businesses
- Lords' last chance to protect broadband customers
- Extreme handwriting recognition on the Dell Latitude XT2
- 12 surprising things that Wolfram Alpha knows
- Nokia N900: phone or pocket computer?
- The sinister side of Spotify
- On test: the hidden seven browsers in the Windows ballot
- The dark side of the web
- Is the CPU dead?
- Five GPS games to play with your smartphone
- The Complete Guide to Office 2010
- The complete guide to Office 2010: OneNote
- The complete guide to Office 2010: Business
- The complete guide to Office 2010: Web Apps
- The complete guide to Office 2010: Word
- The Complete Guide to Office 2010: PowerPoint
- The ease of hacking a WEP network
- Delving into the Norton 2010 line-up
- Banish your Wi-Fi woes
- How to commit Facebook suicide
- Which smartphone keyboard is the best?
- We can beat the botnets
- Paying for code doesn’t mean owning it
- Cracking the iSCSI conundrum
- The perfect open-source task scheduler
- Exploring Microsoft Office 2010 beta
advertisement






Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk