ATI Radeon HD 4890 review
in Graphics cards
Verdict
ATI does it again with its latest GPU, combining superb performance with a reasonable price
Review Date: 1 Apr 2009
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: £199 (£229 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
![]()
Despite its recent successes, ATI hasn't been resting on its laurels. Instead, the AMD-owned firm has released the Radeon HD 4890, a card that promises to be even more powerful than our A List favourite, the HD 4870.
It's still built on a 55nm die, but the core clock speed now stands at 850MHz - 100MHz up on the HD 4870's 750MHz - with the memory clock rising from 900MHz to 975MHz. That memory is GDDR5 and a 1GB frame buffer alongside the GPU's 1.36 TFLOPs computational performance should stand the card in good stead.
In our medium- and high-quality Crysis tests, the HD 4890 averaged 74fps and 47fps respectively, compared to 63fps and 39fps from the older card. But Nvidia's cheaper GeForce GTX 260 core 216 scored a similar 74fps and 43fps.
It's at very high-quality settings, though, where the HD 4890 flexes its muscles. It managed 29fps; just a single frame slower than the dual-GPU Radeon HD 4850 X2, and quicker than almost every Nvidia product we've reviewed. The HD 4890 was just one frame slower than the expensive GeForce GTX 285, and was beaten comprehensively only by the GeForce GTX 295 - a card costing £150 more.
Other tests proved just as conclusive. The HD 4890 managed 46fps in our high-quality Call of Juarez benchmark, compared to 40fps from the HD 4870. Again, only the top-end GeForce GTX 295 bettered it, running 10fps quicker. In fact, Far Cry 2 was the only game that broke this trend. While the HD 4890 ran our high-quality test at 73fps, the GeForce GTX 260 core 216 managed 79fps, with the GTX 295 again proving quicker. A result of 55fps with very high settings is far from unacceptable, though.
Considering the value on offer - cards look set to start at just £199 exc VAT - things look good for the HD 4890. With the only Nvidia-based cards capable of besting it costing upwards of £270, it's clear that, unless you demand ludicrous frame rates, ATI has successfully balanced price and performance once again.
Author: Mike Jennings
From around the web
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






