Asus ENGTX280 TOP review
Verdict
Minor performance boosts over the stock GTX 280 don't justify the high price.
Review Date: 8 Jul 2008
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: (£376 inc VAT)
Nvidia's new GTX 280 GPU is the best performer on the market, but it's under plenty of pressure from ATI's more affordable Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon HD 4870.
There's always scope to get more for your money through overclocking, though, and that's the route taken by Asus for its new ENGTX280 TOP.
It's increased the core clock from 602MHz to 670MHz, and given the shader clock a similarly dramatic boost, from 1,296MHz in reference cards to 1,460MHz.
The memory clock has been increased too, from 2.2GHz to 2.4GHz, though the amount of RAM remains the same, at 1GB of DDR3.
Yet, despite all these clock boosts, we found that performance improvements in our tests to be underwhelming. In our Crysis benchmarks only a handful of frames separated the overclocked Asus from a standard card: its 43fps in the high-detail test was barely better than a stock card's 39fps.
Single-figure frame rate increases continued in our Call of Juarez DirectX 10 benchmark: at high settings the overclocked card scored 36fps compared to the 32fps of a stock card.
And it was the same story in Call of Duty 4, with the Asus card scoring 110fps at high settings compared to 101fps from a standard model.
So in general, the peformance benefit of the ENGTX280 TOP is too small to be useful. Only once did it make a substantial difference - when we tried Crysis at very high detail coupled and with a resolution of 1,600 x 1,200.
Here, the stock card averaged only a jerky 23fps. The ENGTX280 TOP increased this to 27fps, making the game noticeably more playable.
At £319, the overclocked GTX 280 is significantly cheaper than the standard card was at launch. But it's still not a good deal compared to the competition. An ATI Radeon HD 4870 will provide performance approaching these levels for under £200.
While it's true that Asus' overclocked GPU did achieve the highest 3D benchmark scores we've ever seen, it's still too expensive unless you're determined to buy the absolute best.
Author: Mike Jennings
From around the web
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






