ATi Radeon HD 3870 review
Verdict
Impressive performance for such an affordable card, but the 9600 GT treads on its toes.
Review Date: 25 Feb 2008
Reviewed By: David Bayon
Price when reviewed: (£135 inc VAT)
The Radeon HD 3870 sits at the top end of ATi's mid-range offerings and it's proved hugely popular since its launch. Like the HD 3850, it's a 55nm part with 666 million transistors and 320 stream processors. It supports DirectX 10.1, Shader Model 4.1 and the PCI Express 2.0 interface, and is CrossFire-compatible.
It's worth noting that the HD 3870 X2 is essentially two of these GPUs crammed onto a single, very large, board, which has now fallen in price to more sensibly reflect the cost of two individual HD 3870s.
The HD 3870 improves over the HD 3850 with a core clock of 775MHz - compared with 670MHz - and 512MB of cutting-edge GDDR4 memory, running at an effective 2.25GHz compared with 1.66GHz GDDR3. Other than that, they're the same card, with a 256-bit memory bus and similar dimensions. Both require a power supply with plenty of grunt: 450W is recommended, or 550W to run two of them together.
The good news is that this card is only about £20 dearer than the 512MB HD 3850, but offers a significant step up in performance. In Crysis, it was faster at 1,280 x 1,024 and Medium settings by 14%, and the gap increased to 26% when we upped the resolution to 1,600 x 1,200 and High settings. It topped its lesser sibling by similar margins in Call of Duty 4, too: 41fps, compared with 34fps, in our High settings test.
But its closest rival is really Nvidia's 9600 GT. That card was close behind in our Crysis Medium test, with 50fps, also managing an impressive 21fps in our High test, and moving in front with faster results in all of our Call of Duty 4 tests. The 9600 GT will cost you a few pounds less than the HD 3870, at least until ATi fights back with the inevitable price cuts, but both are attractive for the more cost-conscious gamer.
If you can't afford another £50 for the 8800 GTS 512MB, your choice is between this and the 9600 GT. Given its slightly lower price, we'd just about lean towards the GT.
Author: David Bayon
From around the web
advertisement
- LinkedIn revenue doubles as membership soars
- Kodak kills off cameras
- UK broadband project spending £1m on legal fees
- Microsoft: Windows on ARM won't be sold separately
- Intel pays five hours of profits to settle antitrust case
- Windows 8 on ARM to run desktop apps... but only Office
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Data boost bolsters Vodafone revenue
- Google working on cloud storage system
- Lenovo's profit leaps 54% on market gains
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement






