ATi Radeon HD 3870 review
Verdict
Impressive performance for such an affordable card, but the 9600 GT treads on its toes.
Review Date: 25 Feb 2008
Reviewed By: David Bayon
Price when reviewed: (£135 inc VAT)
The Radeon HD 3870 sits at the top end of ATi's mid-range offerings and it's proved hugely popular since its launch. Like the HD 3850, it's a 55nm part with 666 million transistors and 320 stream processors. It supports DirectX 10.1, Shader Model 4.1 and the PCI Express 2.0 interface, and is CrossFire-compatible.
It's worth noting that the HD 3870 X2 is essentially two of these GPUs crammed onto a single, very large, board, which has now fallen in price to more sensibly reflect the cost of two individual HD 3870s.
The HD 3870 improves over the HD 3850 with a core clock of 775MHz - compared with 670MHz - and 512MB of cutting-edge GDDR4 memory, running at an effective 2.25GHz compared with 1.66GHz GDDR3. Other than that, they're the same card, with a 256-bit memory bus and similar dimensions. Both require a power supply with plenty of grunt: 450W is recommended, or 550W to run two of them together.
The good news is that this card is only about £20 dearer than the 512MB HD 3850, but offers a significant step up in performance. In Crysis, it was faster at 1,280 x 1,024 and Medium settings by 14%, and the gap increased to 26% when we upped the resolution to 1,600 x 1,200 and High settings. It topped its lesser sibling by similar margins in Call of Duty 4, too: 41fps, compared with 34fps, in our High settings test.
But its closest rival is really Nvidia's 9600 GT. That card was close behind in our Crysis Medium test, with 50fps, also managing an impressive 21fps in our High test, and moving in front with faster results in all of our Call of Duty 4 tests. The 9600 GT will cost you a few pounds less than the HD 3870, at least until ATi fights back with the inevitable price cuts, but both are attractive for the more cost-conscious gamer.
If you can't afford another £50 for the 8800 GTS 512MB, your choice is between this and the 9600 GT. Given its slightly lower price, we'd just about lean towards the GT.
Author: David Bayon
From around the web
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






