Skip to navigation

XFX GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB review

Verdict

Review Date: 12 Apr 2007

Reviewed By: Clive Webster

Price when reviewed: (£193 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
4 stars out of 6

With the GeForce 8600 still some way off, the 320MB version of the GeForce 8800 GTS is currently the cheapest DirectX 10 graphics hardware available. The GPU itself is exactly the same, and you still get 96 stream processors running at 1.2GHz under the large but quiet heatsink. It was no surprise that Far Cry at 1,600 x 1,200 with 8x AF ran at a ludicrous 82fps. Even our tricky Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion test ran at 46fps, down just 7fps over the 640MB card.

This dip in performance is a result of the lack of local graphics memory; Oblivion at its highest settings uses a lot of high-resolution textures and performance is affected by the 8800 GTS 320MB resorting to shuffling data between the system memory and its own RAM. Things became slightly worse in our hardest Call of Duty 2 test, which uses the 512MB 'Extra' texture settings. Frame rates fell from 47fps on the 640MB GTS to a barely-playable 27fps on this 320MB card. Dropping the texture settings to the 256MB 'High' settings boosted frame rates back up to 47fps.

Normally this wouldn't be a problem; just be a bit careful about in-game texture settings and take the slight visual quality hit. But Vista's DirectX 10 gaming API has a raft of texture-based enhancements that means that games like Crysis and Unreal Tournament 3 will open the gap between the 320MB versions of the 8800 and its higher-end siblings even further.

The GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB leaves us with an agonising choice. It's the cheapest DirectX10 card available, and will dispatch current games and imminent releases without too much bother. But, to achieve the tempting price point, the amount of RAM has been compromised, which means that releases further in the future will run slower. As such, we'd pay the extra £60 for a GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB and future-proof ourselves as much as possible while remaining within a sensible budget. But if you're unwilling to break the £200 barrier for a graphics card, this XFX card will serve you well for a reasonable period of time.

Author: Clive Webster

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Category Reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 review

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

Category: Graphics cards
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £840
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 review

Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

Category: Graphics cards
Rating: 6 out of 6
Price: £430
AMD Radeon HD 7870 review

AMD Radeon HD 7870

Category: Graphics cards
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £275
AMD Radeon HD 7770 review

AMD Radeon HD 7770

Category: Graphics cards
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £126
AMD Radeon HD 7750 review

AMD Radeon HD 7750

Category: Graphics cards
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £95
Compare reviews: Graphics cards

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
More From PC Pro
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.