Samsung Galaxy Camera review
The best parts of a camera and tablet combined – a compelling choice for connected travellers and social network addicts
Review Date: 13 Dec 2012
Reviewed By: Nik Rawlinson
Price when reviewed: £315 (£378 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
Most cameras use proprietary firmware, but Samsung’s latest snapper bucks the trend and runs Android 4.1 instead. This means that, not only can it take pictures to shame your average smartphone, but it can also run any Jelly Bean-compatible app downloaded from Google Play or Samsung’s own store.
Under the hood there’s a 16-megapixel, 1/2.3in backside-illuminated sensor served by a 21x zoom, equivalent to 23-483mm on a 35mm camera. The maximum aperture ranges from f/2.8 at wide angle to f/5.9 at full telephoto, and around the back there’s a huge 4.8in, 1,280 x 800 display – the same size and resolution as the Samsung’s flagship Galaxy S III’s screen.
There’s 3.87GB of integrated memory for apps, data, or storing photos, and if that’s too restrictive you can expand it using the microSD slot in the battery compartment. This sits alongside a near-identical slot for a micro-SIM and it’s easy to get them mixed up. Fortunately, extracting the microSD card when you’ve done just that isn’t too tricky, as long as you have a fine penknife.
Samsung is bundling the Galaxy Camera with a SIM tied to the Three network. It has a month of credit when first installed; it’s up to you whether you want to renew it once your time is up or switch it out for an alternative network.
That’s important, as it’s the built-in 3G and Wi-Fi that makes this camera really interesting. You can't make phone calls with the Galaxy Camera, but you can use it to check your email and browse the web on the move. Of greater interest to the travelling photographer, though, is the option to upload your photos before you get home, share them directly on social networks and, crucially, back them up remotely.
It’s bundled with a two-year, 50GB Dropbox account. Pair the two and your camera will automatically upload every shot and video as it’s captured so when you get back to your PC they’ll already be waiting in the synchronised folder. Transfer speeds will depend on your connection quality, but in an area with poor 3G coverage full-resolution images appear in a Dropbox folder 41 seconds after being shot. That’s slow, but as it happens in the background, not unusably so.
It can’t quite hold its own when compared directly with a traditional camera of similar price, such as the Canon PowerShot S110, which sacrifices resolution and zoom in favour of a larger sensor, brighter lens and greater shooting flexibility. However, the results are unlikely to disappoint in day-to-day use.
Colours are accurate, and although there is some softness in the corners of the frame, images are generally sharp. Macro mode only gets you to within 10cm of your subject, but the depth of field is impressively narrow, and the creamy blur surrounding the subject is even and attractive. There’s evidence of chromatic aberration, though.
talk about the consumer hamster wheel! want want want. NEED?
By gavmeister on 13 Dec 2012
I really like the look and the sound of this camera,one of the better ones I have looked at.
By mick1964 on 13 Dec 2012
I assume it charges from USB, but it would be nice to have confirmation. Canon were crippling their cameras to try and sell accessories.
By tirons1 on 13 Dec 2012
Who wants a second mobile contact?
What a pointless device! Who in their right mind would buy this camera? If you needed to upload images instantly you would just buy a camera with WiFi transfer and use your smartphone to upload images. You then have greater flexibility in your choice of camera and have reduced your mobile costs!
By bernardm3 on 14 Dec 2012
I have 3 SIMs on my contract (no extra cost)...
That said, 99.9% of the photos I take are never uploaded and the few that are can easily wait until I get home and run them through Lightroom...
By big_D on 18 Dec 2012
Cool idea (open source that is)
Today most people I know spend their time taking pictures from cellphones... while phone hardware tends to be lacking... here is an idea! Just wonder how open source it is?... Download some DVR or secondary programs from market bang your camera can do twice as much... what about editing pictures on the go?... haha there's an app for that and its free on Google Play. Lost?... might as well turn navigation on. Have a Google phone account? All this said I think It's not gonna look as geeky as a SLR outfit... your not gonna get the weird person look pulling this out in public... u might get some looks while using it as a phone though... I can't wait to try this one out.
By Robbob2001 on 25 Dec 2012
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold