Skip to navigation

Nikon Coolpix S5100 review

Verdict

A brilliant little camera whose few minor flaws are compensated for by excellent value

Review Date: 22 Sep 2010

Reviewed By: Dave Stevenson

Price when reviewed: £118 (£139 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
5 stars out of 6

Features & Design
4 stars out of 6

Value for Money
6 stars out of 6

Performance
4 stars out of 6

PCPRO Recommended

At less than £150 at launch, the 12.2-megapixel Coolpix S5100 is a very tempting bit of kit. With little more than a fully automatic point-and-shoot mode, though, it has a long way to go to convince us that it deserves a place on the A List.

Build quality feels convincing, although we're left with doubts over the flimsy-feeling battery door; not the first time we've levelled that complaint at a mid-range Nikon compact. The shell is plastic, and the buttons on the back feel a little cheap. However, the S5100 is about as small as any compact can practically be. At 97mm wide and weighing a shade over 130g, it's ideal for dropping into a pocket. The 2.7in, 230,000-pixel screen is another tick in the box: it's bright and reasonably crisp.

Nikon Coolpix S5100

The features list is otherwise sparse. There's a face-priority face-detection mode, which gives focus priority to human faces and works well, and there's a similar self-timer feature. Select the Smart Portrait mode and level the camera at someone's visage, and it will wait until they crack a smile to fire the shutter. It's an impressive party piece, and works reliably, although a group timer mode might have been useful as well.

Otherwise, manual modes are thin on the ground: white balance and two stops of exposure compensation are all you get. While the S5100 may not be a great choice for stills purists, the inclusion of a decent HD 720p, 30fps movie mode is a definite plus, particularly at this price.

The lens' focal length is a modest 28mm-140mm in 35mm terms, but while that doesn't offer spectacular length, it's more than usable for general point-and-shoot photography, and the lens shift image stabiliser is very effective. More importantly, it's extremely sharp. With low ISO settings and careful focusing, the S5100 produced some beautifully crisp images in our tests.

Adjustments on this front run from ISO 100 to a decidedly ambitious ISO 3200. ISOs 100-400 are all but indistinguishable from each other: sharp edges and virtually no noise meant our test shots all looked excellent. ISO 800 began to produce more noise, although not enough to discourage printing at large sizes. Even images taken at ISO 1600 were good enough for printing, if not cropping and enlarging.

Nikon Coolpix S5100 - rear view

Only the top-most setting of ISO 3200 produced seriously flawed images. There's the option to fix the ISO settings to top out at either ISO 400 or 800, should you wish to leave the S5100 to choose its own ISO without visiting the upper reaches of its capabilities.

Of more concern is the S5100's performance when it came to chromatic aberrations, which made unwelcome appearances in almost every test image that had areas of extreme contrast. Spindly tree branches against an overcast sky brought it out especially badly, but it was present elsewhere as well. It's the S5100's only major optical failing, and the single factor that keeps it off the A List.

That the S5100 is available for less than £150 is an undeniably good thing: it generally takes excellent images, purple fringing notwithstanding, and is particularly sharp at lower and middling ISO settings. The 720p movie mode is also a good reason to consider this instead of the Canon Ixus 105, which records video only at VGA resolution. We're not mad about the all-plastic construction or purple-fringing issues, but we like almost everything else.

Author: Dave Stevenson

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here
User comments

Good to see Nikon compacts nearer the top of the pile again

It's only been 10 years or so...

By the_bunker on 23 Sep 2010

It's excellent little camera. I think battery door is quite good but USB flap is ultimately poor. Only back of camera is made of plastic; front is metal (alu). Compared to my Lumix lx-2 this coolpix has excellent metering and white balance. Noise is very pleasing due to luminance nature - not chromatic. Histogram with exposure compensation is also very nice feature.

By Andrea on 10 Jan 2011

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Digital cameras Reviews
Samsung NX30 review

Samsung NX30

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £899
Canon PowerShot G16 review

Canon PowerShot G16

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £539
Sony Cybershot DSC-QX10 review

Sony Cybershot DSC-QX10

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 2 out of 6
Price: £180
Pentax K-500 review

Pentax K-500

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £349
Canon EOS 70D review

Canon EOS 70D

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £1,079
Compare reviews: Digital cameras

advertisement

Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 

 
SEARCH
Loading
WEB ID
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.