Sigma DP2s review
in Digital cameras
1 of 5 
Verdict
A camera that finds its own way to do just about everything; the perfect choice for rich eccentrics
Review Date: 3 Aug 2010
Reviewed By: Ben Pitt
Price when reviewed: £425 (£499 inc VAT)
Overall Rating
Features & Design
Value for Money
Performance
Image Quality
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Part Code | B4U35106021 |
| Review Date | 3 Aug 2010 |
| Price ex VAT | £425 |
| Price inc VAT | £499 |
| Overall rating |
|
| Performance |
|
| Features & Design |
|
| Image quality |
|
| Value for Money |
|
| Basic specifications | |
|---|---|
| Camera megapixel rating | 4.6mp |
| Camera screen size | 2.5in |
| Camera optical zoom range | 1x |
| Camera maximum resolution | 2,640 x 1,760 |
| Weight and dimensions | |
|---|---|
| Weight | 260g |
| Dimensions | 113 x 56 x 59mm (WDH) |
| Battery | |
|---|---|
| Battery type included | Lithium-ion |
| Battery life (CIPA standard) | 250 shots |
| Charger included? |
|
| Other specifications | |
|---|---|
| Built-in flash? |
|
| Aperture range | f2.8 - f2.8 |
| Camera minimum focus distance | 0.28m |
| Shortest focal length (35mm equivalent) | 41 |
| Longest focal length (35mm equivalent) | 41 |
| Minimum (fastest) shutter speed | 1/2,000 |
| Maximum (slowest) shutter speed | 15s |
| Bulb exposure mode? |
|
| RAW recording mode? |
|
| Exposure compensation range | +/- 3EV |
| ISO range | 50 - 800 |
| Selectable white balance settings? |
|
| Manual/user preset white balane? |
|
| Progam auto mode? |
|
| Shutter priority mode? |
|
| Aperture priority mode? |
|
| Fully auto mode? |
|
| Burst frame rate | 3.0fps |
| Exposure bracketing? |
|
| White-balance bracketing? |
|
| Memory-card type | SDHC |
| Viewfinder coverage | N/A |
| LCD resolution | 230k |
| Video/TV output? |
|
| Body construction | Aluminium |
| Tripod mounting thread? |
|
| Data connector type | Proprietary USB |
| Manual, software and accessories | |
|---|---|
| Full printed manual? |
|
| Software supplied | Sigma Pohoto Pro 4.0 |
| Accessories supplied | Soft case, USB and AV cables |
From around the web
User comments
"because their sensors have around five times the surface area of most compacts"
That's not exactly true. If we take APS-C as a standard, typical compact sensor will have around 15 times smaller surface, if compared against full frame SLR - over 30 times.
By Lomskij on 3 Aug 2010 
dgfgd
Wonderful.
Share a website with you ,
( http://www.clothes6.us/ )
Believe you will love it.
By linlin1452 on 6 Aug 2010
Leave a comment
Latest Category Reviews
Compare reviews: Digital cameras
advertisement
More From PC Pro
Latest News Stories 
Latest Blog Posts
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
Latest Features
advertisement
Sponsored Links
