Olympus PEN E-PL1 review
in Digital cameras
Verdict
With more sensible pricing, the latest addition to the PEN range is a definite step in the right direction. Performance problems remain, however
Review Date: 18 Mar 2010
Reviewed By: David Fearon
Price when reviewed: £459 (£539 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
Image Quality
![]()
Away from the negative side, the standout aspect of the E-PL1 is the quality you get for its size. With its large sensor – about ten times the surface area of a typical compact model’s – photos are excellent. Dynamic range is impressive, and high-ISO shots seem even better than the already fine performance of the E-P1. In fact when we first looked at our ISO 3200 test shots we had to double check the image-file metadata to make sure we hadn’t made a settings mistake.
At high ISO a fair amount of detail does get lost and tonal gradation is coarse, but noise levels are remarkably well controlled and way beyond what any standard compact camera can manage. We’d go so far as to say ISO 3200 is genuinely usable, which has never yet been the case with any digital compact.
As a stand-in camcorder the E-PL1 has a fair bit going for it too. At its maximum 720p/30fps video is a little soft but still excellent, and in video mode you have the option of single-shot, continuous or manual focus, although because the focus is electronically linked, it isn’t quiet enough to be inaudible on the soundtrack. The shutter button remains active too, so you can take full-resolution stills while recording.
The lens range has improved of late: we reviewed the E-PL1 with the standard 28-84mm equivalent kit lens, which manually retracts to a fairly compact depth of 45mm when not in use. But for aftermarket add-ons, the very compact (22mm deep) 34mm equivalent fixed “pancake” lens has now been joined by superzoom 28-300mm and wide 18-36mm equivalents.
Quality from the 28-84mm isn't perfect, with noticeable edge softness at wide angle and some fringing in the test shots we took in bright sunlight, but it’s far from ruinous.
A final big point in its favour is the more realistic price. The E-P1 was £700 at launch, but the E-PL1 undercuts that by £150. Camera prices tend to come down a fair way after a couple of months on sale too, at which point the PEN range will finally be at the point where we’d consider it good value.
Even at the lower price point it’s unlikely to be anyone’s first choice when higher quality, easier to use DSLRs – the A-Listed Nikon D5000, for instance – can be had for a lot less cash.
As a luxury second or holiday camera for an enthusiast, however, the E-PL1 has a lot going for it. If you were previously considering one of the higher-end compacts, particularly a Canon Powershot G series, you should be thinking about paying the extra for one of these instead.
Author: David Fearon
From around the web
Autofocus is still slow
So similarly priced GF1 looks like better value.
By Lomskij on 19 Mar 2010 ![]()
Compact
Given I already have a full size DSLR the perfect companion for me would be more like the DMC-LX3. Ok so you cannot change the lens but I'd be more likely to buy new glass for the SLR than the PEN if that was the choice.
I like the concept of the PEN, I just think there are better alternatives.
By pveater on 19 Mar 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






