Panasonic Lumix GF1 review
in Digital cameras
Verdict
A highly likeable high-end compact, but expensive noise at high ISO isn't handled as well as with a proper DSLR
Review Date: 26 Oct 2009
Price when reviewed: £565 (£650 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
Image Quality
![]()
From around the web
So, what exactly is the advantage of in-body optical image stabilisation compared to in-lens? While I prefer the retro look of the EP1, I'd take the better video and in built flash of the GF1 any day.
Also, in terms of value for money, I think you should be comparing this to other 'pro' compacts (I'm not sure if this class of camera has an official name), rather than DSLRs. Compared to the Leica M (ohmygod expensive) and Sigma DP (large sensor, but no interchangeable lens), the GF1 looks like quite a good deal. I'm quite tempted!
By richspeight on 2 Nov 2009 ![]()
So, what exactly is the advantage of in-body optical image stabilisation compared to in-lens?
On a more traditional DSLR it means any lens you use benefits from stabilisation. On this camera maybe it helps to keep the size and cost of the lenses down a little more than if each one had to have OS built in?
By pveater on 14 Dec 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
advertisement







