Panasonic Lumix GF1

So, what exactly is the advantage of in-body optical image stabilisation compared to in-lens? While I prefer the retro look of the EP1, I'd take the better video and in built flash of the GF1 any day.

Also, in terms of value for money, I think you should be comparing this to other 'pro' compacts (I'm not sure if this class of camera has an official name), rather than DSLRs. Compared to the Leica M (ohmygod expensive) and Sigma DP (large sensor, but no interchangeable lens), the GF1 looks like quite a good deal. I'm quite tempted!

By richspeight on 2 Nov 2009

So, what exactly is the advantage of in-body optical image stabilisation compared to in-lens?

On a more traditional DSLR it means any lens you use benefits from stabilisation. On this camera maybe it helps to keep the size and cost of the lenses down a little more than if each one had to have OS built in?

By pveater on 14 Dec 2009