Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Panasonic Lumix GF1

in Digital cameras

  • Panasonic Lumix GF1
  • Panasonic Lumix GF1

Verdict

A highly likeable high-end compact, but expensive noise at high ISO isn't handled as well as with a proper DSLR

Review Date: 26 Oct 2009

Price when reviewed: £565 (£650 inc VAT)

Buy it now for: £628.99

Overall Rating
4 stars out of 6

Features & Design
4 stars out of 6

Value for Money
3 stars out of 6

Performance
4 stars out of 6

Image Quality
6 stars out of 6

There have been many attempts over the years to squeeze DSLR-like power and flexibility into a smaller, lighter and more manageable package. It was kick-started with cameras such as the half-frame Olympus Pen in 1959, and has culminated recently in the emergence of a new breed of compact digitals with high-end pretensions. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 is the latest to hit the shops.

It is without doubt a very compact camera for one with DSLR pretensions. In fact it's a similar size to the Olympus PEN EP-1, the body measuring a mere 74mm deep at its thickest point, 127mm wide and 38mm tall.

It's larger than most digital compacts, but considerably more wieldy than most DSLRs. It's a less obviously retro design than the PEN, however, all square-shouldered with a metal body adding to a solid all-round feel, and it's available in three colours - red, silver and black.

Its size isn't the only thing it shares with the Olympus, though. Both cameras boast the same sensor and lens mount system, known as Micro Four Thirds. And it is this system that allows the GF1 to combine high quality with near-pocketable dimensions. Unlike a DSLR there's no bulky mirror mechanism between the lens and sensor in a Micro Four Thirds camera - which unfortunately means the GF1 suffers from the same drawbacks as the PEN too.

Remove the lens and the sensor is right there in front of you, with nothing to protect it, leaving it worryingly exposed to the elements and the ruinous prod of stray fingers. The lack of mirror also means no optical viewfinder: you have to frame all your shots using the 3in LCD on the rear.

Panasonic Lumix GF1

The latter similarity also highlights one of the major differences between the two cameras: the screen, which at 460k is double the resolution of that on the Olympus PEN EP-1, and makes the job of manual focusing far less of a chore. Meanwhile the optional viewfinder, for those who prefer to shoot at eye level, is of the electronic variety, where Olympus PEN owners only have an optical viewfinder available to them.

Look to the left-hand side and you'll see another advantage - a built-in flash, which pops up on a complicated-looking hinge mechanism. It's not particularly powerful, with a guide number of just six a lot lower than most DSLRs of equivalent price, but it's better than nothing at all.

The GF1's contrast-based autofocus is also much faster than its Olympus rival, contributing to a more DSLR-like feel, and in another coup for Panasonic, the GF1 also boasts autofocus tracking. Simply point the crosshairs at the subject you want to focus on, and the camera will endeavour to follow that subject around as you recompose your shot. The burst mode is good too, allowing you to reel off up to six frames in RAW mode at just under three frames per second.

1 2
User comments

So, what exactly is the advantage of in-body optical image stabilisation compared to in-lens? While I prefer the retro look of the EP1, I'd take the better video and in built flash of the GF1 any day.

Also, in terms of value for money, I think you should be comparing this to other 'pro' compacts (I'm not sure if this class of camera has an official name), rather than DSLRs. Compared to the Leica M (ohmygod expensive) and Sigma DP (large sensor, but no interchangeable lens), the GF1 looks like quite a good deal. I'm quite tempted!

By richspeight on 2 Nov 2009

So, what exactly is the advantage of in-body optical image stabilisation compared to in-lens?

On a more traditional DSLR it means any lens you use benefits from stabilisation. On this camera maybe it helps to keep the size and cost of the lenses down a little more than if each one had to have OS built in?

By pveater on 14 Dec 2009

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Prices for DMC-GF1CEG-K

Seller Price Buy Now Seller Rating
FotoSense.co.uk £628.99 Shop 3 starts out of 5
2 reviews
Warehouseexpress.com £664.99 Shop 5 starts out of 5
73 reviews
Jessops £699.00 0 starts out of 5
2 reviews
Compare reviews: Digital cameras

advertisement

Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008