Canon Digital Ixus 120 IS in Digital cameras
Verdict
Seriously attractive, and capable of some great shots. But it's too expensive
Review Date: 8 Sep 2009
Price when reviewed: £226 (£260 inc VAT)
Buy it now for: £229.74
Overall Rating

Features & Design

Value for Money

Performance

Image Quality


"World's slimmest" is a phrase those with an eye on consumer technology hear a lot, and this month it's Canon's turn to wear the crown. At only 20mm deep and 90mm wide the Ixus 120 IS is smaller than a mobile phone, yet Canon has managed to squeeze into that tiny shell a camera fully deserving of the Ixus brand.
There's a 12.1-megapixel sensor inside that produces wonderful images, for instance. In our test shots we saw excellent colours, and the 4x optical zoom lens (equivalent to 28-112mm in 35mm terms) is sharp, with just a hint of softness towards the corners.
Beyond ISO 400 things start to look a little muddy, and by the time you hit ISO 1600 you'll need a very good reason to avoid using the flash, but in general we were delighted with our set of test shots.
The Ixus 120's current competitor is another Canon compact, the A-Listed Canon Digital Ixus 95.
Spotting differences between them is tricky. The Ixus 120 produces slightly larger images, thanks to its 12.1-megapixel sensor, and its 2.7in screen is larger than the 95's, albeit only by 0.2in. The Ixus 120 has also lost the 95's optical viewfinder - one of the last vestiges of the film era.
We can't say we miss it, though, particularly thanks to the Ixus 120's superb, bright screen. We also appreciate the inclusion of the AF-Point Zoom mode, which magnifies the focused area of the frame before you press the shutter - handy for checking focus.
There are some excellent face detection features too. You can set the timer to face detect mode and frame a shot of some friends, and the Ixus 120 will wait until a new face joins the crowd before it takes the shot. The blink detection feature also works well.
A small disappointment is the lack of any manual controls. Even in night mode, you have to simply trust that the Ixus 120 will expose a scene correctly. There are other problems too. First, the body is so small that the Menu button and the right direction pad button wrap around the side of the body, and it's so slim that it isn't terribly comfortable to hold, at least for those with big hands.
The problem of the price is more serious. For as long as the Ixus 95 can be had for less than £200, it's likely to stay on the A List. The Ixus 120 IS improves on the 95 in several ways, but doesn't take noticeably better pictures. So while the Ixus 95 is available, we recommend you save your cash.
Author: Dave Stevenson
At last a wide angle
I have had two great little canons in the past, an A40 and an ixus 40 and what let both of them down was an inability to photograph big buildings while on holiday. The wide angle wasn't particularly wide.
This camera finally does it in a slim design. For that reason alone, it will be an important enough upgrade for some people. If faces is what turns you on, then wide angle is wasted. Your conclusion is thus too weighted to one side of the user group.
Sadly I had already had to jump ship to Panasonic for my compact (though I also use a canon DSLR).
By fellwalker2000 on 10 Sep 2009 
Latest Prices for 3641B001
| Seller | Price | Buy Now | Seller Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
£229.74 | Shop |
77 reviews |
![]() |
£238.99 | Shop |
928 reviews |
![]() |
£239.15 | Shop |
515 reviews |
![]() |
£249.00 | Shop |
2 reviews |
| Ideal Emart | £253.43 | Shop |
|
advertisement
- Sky Player shows up in Windows 7
- Tweetlevel reveals most influential Twitterers
- Apple "refuses to repair smokers' Macs"
- Spotify arrives on Symbian
- Chrome OS and Android to "converge over time"
- Microsoft to pay News Corp to stay off Google
- Christmas sales surge knocks out eBay search
- Windows 8 set for 2012 release
- Q&A: Why Conficker was a victim of its own success
- App developers losing faith in Android
- ATI Radeon HD 5970: 42% more expensive in the UK
- Office 2010 Beta – 32-bit or 64-bit – The Choice is Clear
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device
- Microsoft Office 2010 screenshots: Recover unsaved items
- The sci-fi legends who shaped today's tech
- Conficker's first birthday: how a year of havoc unfolded
- When will you get superfast broadband?
- The Crapware Con
- The 10 greatest tech U-turns
- Windows 7: everything you need to know
- PC 2010 and beyond
- The High Street Rip Off
- How to avoid the high-street rip-offs
- Do online protests really work?
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk










