Skip to navigation

Chillblast Fusion Eyefinity review

in Desktop PCs

Verdict

It pairs Eyefinity technology with a lightning-fast rig that can power it, but you’ll really need to love your games to justify the price

Review Date: 7 Dec 2009

Reviewed By: Mike Jennings

Price when reviewed: £1,999 (£2,299 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
4 stars out of 6

Features & Design
5 stars out of 6

Value for Money
3 stars out of 6

Performance
6 stars out of 6

It’s not every day a new technology promises to run games at a resolution of 5,760 x 2,160 and across six screens, but that’s the aim of ATI’s Eyefinity. The process is surprisingly simple: multiple monitors are automatically grouped together by ATI’s Catalyst driver so the GPU sees them as a single, continuous desktop.

For its Fusion Eyefinity PC, Chillblast has picked an ATI Radeon HD 5870 card and, while this may not be the rare (we suspect non-existent) Eyefinity 6 Edition that can power six screens, it can still output 5,760 x 1,080 across three Full HD displays.

Chillblast Fusion Eyefinity

ATI claims Eyefinity’s increased resolution makes games more immersive and the average PC far more versatile; at first glance, it’s hard to disagree. Burnout Paradise’s palpable sense of speed is heightened with two extra monitors to show the world whizzing past, while the jungles of Crysis impose themselves far more when you’re hemmed in by them.

Potential problems are tackled at the driver level. The left- and right-hand images are very slightly blurred and stretched in the style of a fisheye lens (see below), with the effect more pronounced towards the far edge of the image. It’s a neat trick that does a decent job of replicating our peripheral vision.

ATI Eyefinity in action

The 18mm side bezels on the monitors weren’t as irritating as we expected, either. While it’s impossible not to notice them, especially when fast-moving images jump across the divide, we found our eyes merely adjusted and filtered them out, much as they do with a car’s A-pillars.

However, several niggling issues can’t be ignored. Heads-up displays in games were stretched across the full resolution of the screen, with mini-maps and gauges shunted to the furthest reaches of our peripheral vision. It’s possible to glance at these comfortably only if you’re sitting a fair distance back from the screen, which is both impractical and rather defeats the point of the surround experience.

In fact, we found that, while huddled up at a desk, we couldn’t concentrate on such a vast area at once. Where that’s the intention – such as Burnout’s blurred sense of speed – it’s not an issue, but details on those side screens can feel dislocated from the core experience.

ATI also claims Office applications benefit from Eyefinity, with the vast desktop space lending itself to multitasking. However, the extra video outputs are the only tangible benefit here over a traditional dual-monitor setup.

Eyefinity aside, the three 22in Dell Professional P2210H panels offer Full HD 1,920 x 1,080 resolutions, so three together makes for a long, narrow viewing area. With good image quality and accurate colours, they’re more than good enough for everyday use, even if the darkest black shades expose slight backlight bleeding at the bottom of the screens.

1 2
Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

Excessive?

To some gamers I dare say this will appeal, but isnt it really just overkill for its own sake?

Shakes his head sadly, returning his attention to Eve online running on a 46 inch sony hdtv.....

By kevinius on 8 Dec 2009

Ultimate display

Hey.Now theres an idea.Try it with 3no 52" HDTV's across.Now thats what I would call immersive.:-)

By Jaberwocky on 8 Dec 2009

Why can't I just read a document anymore

Why is the graphics industry limiting itself to the TV screen resolution sizes?

At 1600x1200, the vertical resolution of 1200 is large enough to work on A4 text documents full size and actually ready the whole page of text. Games also look fine at 1600x1200. Why limit everything to a TV's letterbox view of the world?

Perhaps just turn the 3 screens through 90 degrees to give an Eyefinity desktop of 3240 x 1920?? Same number of pixels = same processing power, but surely a better shape/ratio?

By ContactGT on 10 Dec 2009

pc gaming

why pay that money for a gaming pc when pc gaming is becoming extinct... take cod modern warefare 2 for example, it is quite clear infinity ward gave the pc version very little thought in comparison with the console version

By eliot94 on 10 Dec 2009

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Desktop PCs Reviews
Chillblast Fusion Elixir review

Chillblast Fusion Elixir

Category: Desktop PCs
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £599
Quiet PC Streacom FC5-Z68 Fanless Media PC review

Quiet PC Streacom FC5-Z68 Fanless Media PC

Category: Desktop PCs
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £1,526
Yoyotech XDNA Platinum review

Yoyotech XDNA Platinum

Category: Desktop PCs
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £2,498
Tranquil PC MMC-12 review

Tranquil PC MMC-12

Category: Desktop PCs
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £779
HP TouchSmart 520 review

HP TouchSmart 520

Category: Desktop PCs
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £742
Compare reviews: Desktop PCs

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
More From PC Pro
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.