Asus ENGTX280 TOP
Verdict
Minor performance boosts over the stock GTX 280 don't justify the high price.
Review Date: 8 Jul 2008
Price when reviewed: (£376 inc VAT)
Overall Rating

Nvidia's new GTX 280 GPU is the best performer on the market, but it's under plenty of pressure from ATI's more affordable Radeon HD 4850 and Radeon HD 4870.
There's always scope to get more for your money through overclocking, though, and that's the route taken by Asus for its new ENGTX280 TOP.
It's increased the core clock from 602MHz to 670MHz, and given the shader clock a similarly dramatic boost, from 1,296MHz in reference cards to 1,460MHz.
The memory clock has been increased too, from 2.2GHz to 2.4GHz, though the amount of RAM remains the same, at 1GB of DDR3.
Yet, despite all these clock boosts, we found that performance improvements in our tests to be underwhelming. In our Crysis benchmarks only a handful of frames separated the overclocked Asus from a standard card: its 43fps in the high-detail test was barely better than a stock card's 39fps.
Single-figure frame rate increases continued in our Call of Juarez DirectX 10 benchmark: at high settings the overclocked card scored 36fps compared to the 32fps of a stock card.
And it was the same story in Call of Duty 4, with the Asus card scoring 110fps at high settings compared to 101fps from a standard model.
So in general, the peformance benefit of the ENGTX280 TOP is too small to be useful. Only once did it make a substantial difference - when we tried Crysis at very high detail coupled and with a resolution of 1,600 x 1,200.
Here, the stock card averaged only a jerky 23fps. The ENGTX280 TOP increased this to 27fps, making the game noticeably more playable.
At £319, the overclocked GTX 280 is significantly cheaper than the standard card was at launch. But it's still not a good deal compared to the competition. An ATI Radeon HD 4870 will provide performance approaching these levels for under £200.
While it's true that Asus' overclocked GPU did achieve the highest 3D benchmark scores we've ever seen, it's still too expensive unless you're determined to buy the absolute best.
Author: Mike Jennings
advertisement
- Kindle update brings native PDF support
- Lenovo launches first ever ThinkCentre all-in-one PC
- Average mobile broadband speed only 0.87Mbits/sec
- iPhone hitting Tesco in time for Christmas
- Gmail adds offline attachments
- Mobile data surges up by 16% in October
- OFT: Google isn't harming consumers
- £90 million buys South Yorkshire 25Mbits/sec broadband
- Twitter ready to splash out... and run ads
- LogMeIn Express offers fuss-free screen sharing
- Need a bit of extra Christmas cash? Grass up your boss, says BSA
- Photoshop Mobile on Android review: first look
- ATI Radeon HD 5970: 42% more expensive in the UK
- Office 2010 Beta – 32-bit or 64-bit – The Choice is Clear
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- The sci-fi legends who shaped today's tech
- Conficker's first birthday: how a year of havoc unfolded
- When will you get superfast broadband?
- The Crapware Con
- The 10 greatest tech U-turns
- Windows 7: everything you need to know
- PC 2010 and beyond
- The High Street Rip Off
- How to avoid the high-street rip-offs
- Do online protests really work?
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk


