UMA: Routing your BlackBerry calls over Wi-Fi
Posted on 23 Aug 2010 at 13:57
Paul Ockenden connects a BlackBerry to Orange's Unlicensed Mobile Access service
In my own testing UMA has worked well. I’ve used it at home (where right now I have two wireless networks, one running off a DrayTek 2820Vn, the other off a Netgear ProSafe DGFV338) and also out and about at various places with free public Wi-Fi access.
I’ve had no problems at all and have found calls over UMA/Wi-Fi to be just as clear as those made over the mobile network. In fact, in areas with poor mobile coverage the UMA calls have been significantly better. I also tested call hand-off from Wi-Fi back to the mobile network, by starting a call over UMA then yanking the power cable from my wireless router.
There was a very short period of silence – a fraction of a second, barely noticeable – and then the call continued as normal, which is very impressive and only possible because UMA is so deeply integrated into the carrier’s network infrastructure.
Reader's results
Although Orange’s UMA service works like a dream for me, other readers haven’t reported the same success. Typical is an email from Chris Upton in which he says: “I was very interested to read your column on UMA access, as I was trying to set this up myself only last week. I have a BlackBerry Curve 8900, which supports UMA and indeed was picking up UMA signals in Vietnam when I was on holiday there over Easter. My router is PlusNet standard issue Thomson Speedtouch TG585 v7 and my ISP is PlusNet.
"My BlackBerry connects to the router through its normal Wi-Fi connection very satisfactorily, but doesn’t show UMA on the display. Orange says the router may not support UMA (it says its own Livebox, the BT HomeHub and some Netgears are the only ones the company knows that support UMA). I spoke to PlusNet, which claims never to have heard of UMA and passed me on to Thomson.
"Thomson also claims never to have heard of UMA and didn’t sound very interested. There seem to be mixed reviews of the effectiveness of UMA on various forums on the net. Some are quite disparaging, saying it isn’t reliable and is old technology that BT Fusion used but has now dropped. PC Pro’s excellent review of routers in issue 187 didn’t mention UMA – does this mean it’s supported by all these routers, or not considered important?”
UMA shouldn’t need any special magic in the router at all
Well Chris, UMA shouldn’t need any special magic in the router at all – any standard Wi-Fi modem, router, or access point should work just fine.
The only enhancement some might offer is to prioritise UMA traffic, so that you get better streaming performance on a heavily loaded network. As long as the BlackBerry connects to the wireless infrastructure properly, UMA should work.
And despite what you might read on some forums, there’s no need to mess around with port forwarding and stuff like that: as long as your router’s firewall isn’t blocking outbound ports (which it shouldn’t) then everything should just work.
Having trouble?
If you’re struggling with either Wi-Fi or UMA, it’s worth taking a look at the Wi-Fi diagnostics page. It takes a little digging but you’ll find it by going to Options | Wi-Fi then clicking the menu key and selecting Wi-Fi Tools | Wi-Fi Diagnostics.
This is a useful screen that updates dynamically, so there’s no need to keep popping in and out to refresh it. In the Wi-Fi section, you’re looking for a sensible local IP address and a status of “Network acquired”, and further down the page you need to see green ticks beside the three items under “BlackBerry Infrastructure”.
If yours is a corporate BlackBerry running on a BES, you’ll also see a section called “Enterprise” – and again, ideally you want to see green ticks, although because of the way BlackBerry works this isn’t essential; traffic can still route via the NOC and back to your BES.
Finally, you’ll see a section called “UMA” and if all is working properly you’ll see green ticks for “UMA Wi-Fi Available” and “Connection”, and a status of “UMA Connection successful”.
If your Wi-Fi Diagnostics screen shows anything else, it’s worth giving Orange customer services a call.
Download a year of Paul Ockenden's Mobile & Wireless columns by heading to our Free Downloads site
From around the web
Roaming?
How does this interact with the extortionate roaming charges levied by networks? Given a UMA connection in the UK is charged exactly as a UK GSM connection but is routed over the internet, what happens to a UMA connection in (say) the US?
Does Orange deny the connection on an IP geolocation basis, even though technically there is nothing to prevent it working flawlessly? Does Orange charge it as a normal UK GSM call (as it should, given there is no marginal cost to Orange over a UK UMA connection)? Or does Orange use IP geolocation to implement a flagrant price gouging strategy where they charge US roaming rates to connect over UMA from the US?
By flyingbadger on 23 Aug 2010 ![]()
T-Mobile in USA
I use the UMA feature on my 9700 here in the US on T-Mobile (not roaming). It works quite well not only on my home network but in restaurants where I have previously connected to the internet. It automatically goes on their network if I return there.
One problem I found is that if you originate a call while on UMA then move out of the wifi coverage area the call drops.
By juliand2 on 25 Aug 2010 ![]()
@flyingbadger
I'm going to guess it's option 3.
I would like to know this answer myself. Also, when is TMobile going to get its business sorted out with UMA?
By steviesteveo on 30 Sep 2010 ![]()
Roaming OK T-Mobile USA
T-Mobile USA charges extra ($30/month) for UMA access but with it I am able to make calls using UMA from any WiFi router in the world, with no extra charge. The UMA plan for T-Mobile lets you make ulimated free calls using UMA ... if I wasn't in Senegal I would try just having an unlimited minutes plan for my mobile and cancel the extra charges. I use UMA in Dakar all the time. It is revolutionary to have access to my USA mobile number while overseas without paying massive roaming charges.
By RTPDkr on 7 Oct 2010 ![]()
But watch out what phone you get ...
As noted in the article, the easiest way to hook up UMA is with a phone from your service provider. I once bought a "UMA phone" made by Nokia and it just would not hook into the T-Mobile network. The UMA-specific customer service rep said that they found that some UMA phones just would not work with their network, and the particular Nokia I bought (6136) was one of them.
By RTPDkr on 7 Oct 2010 ![]()
UMA take up disappointing
I was quite excited by the prospect of UMA (maybe I should get out more..) as the signal at home is non-existent in the house (for any carrier) and pretty bad in the local area generally.
To try it out I got a used Nokia 6301 on eBay (it happened to be Orange branded and Orange is the only UMA service provided in the UK). I find the phone a bit quirky as regards to connecting to my wifi routers (I have two in my home and one elsewhere). I spent ages trying to get it to connect and failing. Finally, I found that, if I just entered the settings and left it alone, it would connect fairly reliably. It even hands over between the two routers in my home (once I found the right config setting). Having the wifi on means the battery will only last a day or so, but I can cope with that for the benefit of being able to make and receive calls without the hassle of diverting to my home phone as I had to before.
Having convinced myself of its value, I started to look for UMA enabled phones - that’s when disappointment set in. Only Blackberry seems to support it now (at least as far as Orange UK is concerned). Nokia had a brief flirtation and have given up.
This is very disappointing as it looks like the technology hasn’t taken off. Have you any thoughts on why this might be and whether it will change?
Rgrds
F
By filkett on 8 Nov 2010 ![]()
Paul Ockenden
Paul is a contributing editor to PC Pro specialising in smartphones, mobile broadband and all things wireless. He's technical director of a combined IT and marketing company, which works on websites and intranets for several blue-chip clients.
advertisement
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Autonomy's Lynch joins 27,000 on way out of HP
- ICO: no fines for breaking cookie rules
- HP set to slash up to 30,000 jobs
- Government sites to miss cookie deadline
- Microsoft tweaks multi-monitor support in Windows 8
- Apple patches Leopard, despite ending support last year
- Defra opens rural broadband funding applications
- BT's broadband sales surpass calls revenue
- Apple patches multiple security issues
- FBI warns travellers to beware attacks via hotel Wi-Fi
advertisement
