Inside OpenOffice 3.2
Posted on 23 Jun 2010 at 15:19
Simon Jones gets down and dirty with the latest version of OpenOffice
In February, OpenOffice released version 3.2 of its eponymous software suite, which brings quite a few new features and improvements in speed, reliability, file format support and ease of use. It isn’t a total revolution, but another small evolution that should please existing users of the suite.
The developers have improved the cold start time for the applications from around ten seconds in version 3 to six seconds in 3.2, without the assistance of the QuickStart applet that loads many key DLLs when you start your PC so that OpenOffice will start up even faster when you want it.
If you do deploy QuickStart then application startup time drops to between two and three seconds, although timings vary depending on your operating system and the speed of your PC. It’s a pity, however, that the marketing people at OpenOffice trumpet this fast-loading feature using a chart for which they would have been rapped over the knuckles if they’d been taught by my maths teacher.
To illustrate the 46% reduction in load time they plot a line that descends from ten seconds to six seconds, but they start the Y axis of their chart at four instead of zero, which exaggerates the magnitude of the change.
OpenOffice can now output to ODF files that comply with the ODF 1.2 standard better than previous versions, and it warns you if you use any feature that’s outside that standard. This is certainly good news for people who expect to be able to exchange ODF documents with other people who are using different authoring applications, but you have to ask why OpenOffice still isn’t fully compliant with a standard that was basically defined by this application.
You can turn off the extensions and save to pure ODF 1.2 files, under Tools | Options | Save, but there are still worrying questions over the use of other file formats.
OpenOffice can read Microsoft Office 2007 OOXML files, but it can’t write them and it does a poor job of converting OOXML files if they contain anything more than very basic formatting – opening an Office 2007 document that contains complex formatting can cause it to crash.
It can read and write Microsoft Office files in 97/2000/XP format, and does a better job of interpreting these, but it may still introduce inconsistencies and aberrations that you wouldn’t know about unless you have access to the originating application (or a copy of the document printed by that application).
There’s now much better handling of cell borders in the Calc module of version OpenOffice 3.2. You can apply borders to any number of selected ranges with one click, and AutoFill will now work with user-defined lists of terms as well as numbers, dates, days of the week or months of the year.
These lists also allow you to sort their members into a user-defined order, rather than alphabetical or numerical. One feature whose tardy introduction will provoke cries of “at last!”, is an enhancement to the sorting of cells, which finally moves the formatting of those cells along with their data, and filtering can now cope with up to eight conditions, including “contains” and “begins with”.
From around the web
Same sh*t different year!
but hey, it's free!
By neillbrooks on 3 Jul 2010 ![]()
I had so much compatibility trouble with Open Office that I've deleted it from my PC and now use Google Docs exclusively. Whilst the features of Docs are a little slimline, that's so bad thing relative to best use of time, and it all just works. For me, simpler is better.
By Bureaunet on 14 Jul 2010 ![]()
Okay, but not the best alternative
OpenOffice is free, which is hard to argue with. And it runs seamlessly on lots of different platforms, which is also a real plus. But I've abandoned it for SoftMaker's amazing Office 2010, which is a wonderful MS-Office alternative. They're a small German firm with a big programming brain, and their three apps (equivalent to the Big Three in MS-Office) are certainly equal - if not superior - to OpenOffice, and in terms of sheer speed and small footpring are superior to MS-Office, too. Conversion to/from Office formats is 95% perfect, and it also handles long documents exceptionally well (and fast). A slightly cut-down version sells (very cheaply) as Ashampoo Office. It's the only real MS-Office contender, in reality - Ability Office is just too flawed to be a realistic alternative, IMHO...
By MadaboutDana on 27 Jul 2010 ![]()
Sorry about that...
"footpring" sounds rather cool, but of course I meant "footprint"...
By MadaboutDana on 27 Jul 2010 ![]()
Simon Jones
Simon is a contributing editor to PC Pro. He's an independent IT consultant specialising in Microsoft Office, Visual Basic and SQL Server.
advertisement
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- SAP willing to share HANA with Oracle
- Why using a tablet could harm your health
- New RIM boss: no need for drastic change
- RIM founders fall on their swords
- Slow economy helps boost Red Hat revenue by 23%
- Google+ pages get multiple admins
- One in five companies lack card industry compliance
- Oil industry warns hacking attacks could kill
- British workers fear email monitoring
advertisement

