Capacitive or resistive: what's the best type of touchscreen?
Posted on 16 Apr 2010 at 16:38
Paul Ockenden explains smartphone touchscreen technologies
I’m going to deal with a topic that’s sparked more than a dozen emails recently. A typical one is Steven Barrett, who asks:
“I keep reading about capacitive and resistive touchscreens, but I’m not sure what the real-world differences are. Capacitive screens generally receive more favourable reviews than resistive, but I’ve seen some strong views in the other direction on various blogs and online forums, with people saying that resistive screens are more accurate. I’d appreciate your views on which screen technology to choose.”
Well, Steve, that’s quite a can of worms you’ve just opened, and it’s worth taking a quick refresher on how both technologies work. The resistive touchscreen is the older technology, at least in the smartphone arena.
The front surface is made of scratch-resistant, flexible plastic with a thin film of conductive material (usually Indium Tin Oxide or ITO) printed onto its underside. Beneath it is a second layer – usually made of glass, but sometimes of hard plastic – also with a coating of ITO.
The two layers are kept apart by tiny bumps or spacers placed at regular intervals, and the thin layers of ITO create an appreciable electrical resistance – the sandwich is so constructed that electrical charge runs from top to bottom on one layer but side-to-side on the other layer.
When the screen is touched the plastic deforms so that the two ITO films meet, and by measuring the resistance of both layers at their point of contact it’s possible to get an accurate measurement of the touch position. This, of course, relies on an even coating of ITO on the layers, plus accurate calibration: with some early touchscreen mobiles, the calibration could drift as the battery became depleted, but nowadays, unless you buy a fake phone, you shouldn’t experience this problem.
Most older phones use resistive screens, but that isn’t to say it’s an out-of-date technology, as phones are still being churned out using this type of screen (a good clue is normally, although not always, that the device is supplied with a stylus). Most people probably first encounter resistive screens in Windows Mobile devices (apart from the HTC HD2!).
There are two types of capacitive touchscreen generally available, surface and projected, and it’s the latter that you’ll find in smartphones. These again consist of a sandwich, but this time of two spaced layers of glass, again coated with ITO on the inside.
Depending on the particular screen, the ITO layer may be a uniform coat, a grid, or parallel stripes running at right angles on the two sheets. The latter scheme is used in the iPhone and the iPod Touch Duplo, better known as the iPad.
Think back to O Level physics, and you might remember that a capacitor consists of two plates separated by an insulating material, which may of course be air. Now picture those perpendicular stripes on two glass plates – wherever a stripe crosses one below it forms a capacitor so small it’s measured in femtofarads (10-15F).
This small size is both bad news and good: bad, because such a tiny capacitance is difficult to measure and requires complex filtering to eliminate noise; good, because given such a small capacitance it isn’t just the gap between the “plates” that affects the capacitance but also the space around them.
As your finger comes close to a capacitor it changes the local electrostatic field, and the system constantly monitors each tiny capacitor to discover exactly where the finger touched the screen: because the measurement points are discrete, it’s possible to tell whether several fingers are all touching the screen at once, unlike with a resistive unit.
With regards to the barrier on capacitive screens...
...not quite true there. There are a few protective overlays/films that you can buy for devices such as the iPhone that still allow it to function properly. The one that springs to mind is the invisibleSHIELD, which has almost no effect on the operation.
However, I removed mine as I wasn't happy with the clarity of the screen when applied (it's not bad at all but I'm picky).
By mviracca on 16 Apr 2010
Shields and RDP
I've used an invisibleSHIELD on my iPod Touch, it worked fine, although it added a layer of obscurity to the display, the same as for resistive screens.
As to RDP, I use that a lot on my iPhone, along with the Citrix client. It tends to work just fine most of the time. The biggest problem is logging out - selecting log off, then trying to scroll the screen without the Logoff dialog losing focus...
By big_D on 19 Apr 2010
invisibleSHIELD and waterproof case
I use my iPhone with an invisibleSHIELD and a Aquapac waterproof case, with no problems at all.
By Markso on 21 Apr 2010
- Facebook "click on the photo" scams: how they work
- Three alternatives to Word's spelling and grammar checker
- Google two-step verification: a must for business email
- Microsoft Office and the death of upgrades
- The ICO's shame-faced u-turn on cookies
- Start8 and ModernMix: making Windows 8 work on a desktop
- How to boost your mobile reception
- How to fix Facebook: Social Fixer
- Taking the stress out of WordPress updates
- Where to download free web fonts
- Huawei Ascend P6 review: first look
- Adobe Illustrator CC review: first look
- Let MPs tell us what they really want ISPs to block
- Adobe Photoshop CC review: first look
- WWDC 2013 and iOS 7 launch: live blog
- Sony VAIO Pro review: first look
- Want child porn blocked? Meet the IWF
- Is it worth upgrading a media centre to Windows 8?
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- AMD’s "Seattle" ARM chips set for 2014 release
- Adobe’s subscription-only Creative Cloud goes live
- BBC "misled" MPs over failed £100 million IT project
- Join the PC Pro Business Lunch for the finance sector
- MPs "shocked" Huawei-BT deal wasn't vetted
- Government wastes "three days a year" booting PCs
- Windows 8.1 brings back the Start button
- Microsoft connects Skype to Lync
- Cisco moves to block Microsoft-Skype deal
- Half of the UK’s biggest sites break cookie rules