Capacitive or resistive: what's the best type of touchscreen?
Posted on 16 Apr 2010 at 16:38
Paul Ockenden explains smartphone touchscreen technologies
I’m going to deal with a topic that’s sparked more than a dozen emails recently. A typical one is Steven Barrett, who asks:
“I keep reading about capacitive and resistive touchscreens, but I’m not sure what the real-world differences are. Capacitive screens generally receive more favourable reviews than resistive, but I’ve seen some strong views in the other direction on various blogs and online forums, with people saying that resistive screens are more accurate. I’d appreciate your views on which screen technology to choose.”
Well, Steve, that’s quite a can of worms you’ve just opened, and it’s worth taking a quick refresher on how both technologies work. The resistive touchscreen is the older technology, at least in the smartphone arena.
The front surface is made of scratch-resistant, flexible plastic with a thin film of conductive material (usually Indium Tin Oxide or ITO) printed onto its underside. Beneath it is a second layer – usually made of glass, but sometimes of hard plastic – also with a coating of ITO.
The two layers are kept apart by tiny bumps or spacers placed at regular intervals, and the thin layers of ITO create an appreciable electrical resistance – the sandwich is so constructed that electrical charge runs from top to bottom on one layer but side-to-side on the other layer.
When the screen is touched the plastic deforms so that the two ITO films meet, and by measuring the resistance of both layers at their point of contact it’s possible to get an accurate measurement of the touch position. This, of course, relies on an even coating of ITO on the layers, plus accurate calibration: with some early touchscreen mobiles, the calibration could drift as the battery became depleted, but nowadays, unless you buy a fake phone, you shouldn’t experience this problem.
Most older phones use resistive screens, but that isn’t to say it’s an out-of-date technology, as phones are still being churned out using this type of screen (a good clue is normally, although not always, that the device is supplied with a stylus). Most people probably first encounter resistive screens in Windows Mobile devices (apart from the HTC HD2!).
There are two types of capacitive touchscreen generally available, surface and projected, and it’s the latter that you’ll find in smartphones. These again consist of a sandwich, but this time of two spaced layers of glass, again coated with ITO on the inside.
Depending on the particular screen, the ITO layer may be a uniform coat, a grid, or parallel stripes running at right angles on the two sheets. The latter scheme is used in the iPhone and the iPod Touch Duplo, better known as the iPad.
Think back to O Level physics, and you might remember that a capacitor consists of two plates separated by an insulating material, which may of course be air. Now picture those perpendicular stripes on two glass plates – wherever a stripe crosses one below it forms a capacitor so small it’s measured in femtofarads (10-15F).
This small size is both bad news and good: bad, because such a tiny capacitance is difficult to measure and requires complex filtering to eliminate noise; good, because given such a small capacitance it isn’t just the gap between the “plates” that affects the capacitance but also the space around them.
As your finger comes close to a capacitor it changes the local electrostatic field, and the system constantly monitors each tiny capacitor to discover exactly where the finger touched the screen: because the measurement points are discrete, it’s possible to tell whether several fingers are all touching the screen at once, unlike with a resistive unit.
With regards to the barrier on capacitive screens...
...not quite true there. There are a few protective overlays/films that you can buy for devices such as the iPhone that still allow it to function properly. The one that springs to mind is the invisibleSHIELD, which has almost no effect on the operation.
However, I removed mine as I wasn't happy with the clarity of the screen when applied (it's not bad at all but I'm picky).
By mviracca on 16 Apr 2010
Shields and RDP
I've used an invisibleSHIELD on my iPod Touch, it worked fine, although it added a layer of obscurity to the display, the same as for resistive screens.
As to RDP, I use that a lot on my iPhone, along with the Citrix client. It tends to work just fine most of the time. The biggest problem is logging out - selecting log off, then trying to scroll the screen without the Logoff dialog losing focus...
By big_D on 19 Apr 2010
invisibleSHIELD and waterproof case
I use my iPhone with an invisibleSHIELD and a Aquapac waterproof case, with no problems at all.
By Markso on 21 Apr 2010
- How to sell more ebooks on Amazon
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- Will HP finally split into two companies?
- Chromebooks get version of Photoshop
- Toshiba beats retreat from consumer PC market
- Ellison steps down: but who's really running Oracle now?
- Microsoft set to make more job cuts
- Is Peter Pan panto tickets email genuine? Oh no, it isn't
- Intel triples Xeon E5 chip performance, adds DDR4
- Patch Tuesday targets critical IE flaw
- Microsoft refuses to hand over customer emails
- Microsoft yanks Windows 8.1 update after crash reports