Capacitive or resistive: what's the best type of touchscreen?
Posted on 16 Apr 2010 at 16:38
Paul Ockenden explains smartphone touchscreen technologies
I’m going to deal with a topic that’s sparked more than a dozen emails recently. A typical one is Steven Barrett, who asks:
“I keep reading about capacitive and resistive touchscreens, but I’m not sure what the real-world differences are. Capacitive screens generally receive more favourable reviews than resistive, but I’ve seen some strong views in the other direction on various blogs and online forums, with people saying that resistive screens are more accurate. I’d appreciate your views on which screen technology to choose.”
Well, Steve, that’s quite a can of worms you’ve just opened, and it’s worth taking a quick refresher on how both technologies work. The resistive touchscreen is the older technology, at least in the smartphone arena.
The front surface is made of scratch-resistant, flexible plastic with a thin film of conductive material (usually Indium Tin Oxide or ITO) printed onto its underside. Beneath it is a second layer – usually made of glass, but sometimes of hard plastic – also with a coating of ITO.
The two layers are kept apart by tiny bumps or spacers placed at regular intervals, and the thin layers of ITO create an appreciable electrical resistance – the sandwich is so constructed that electrical charge runs from top to bottom on one layer but side-to-side on the other layer.
When the screen is touched the plastic deforms so that the two ITO films meet, and by measuring the resistance of both layers at their point of contact it’s possible to get an accurate measurement of the touch position. This, of course, relies on an even coating of ITO on the layers, plus accurate calibration: with some early touchscreen mobiles, the calibration could drift as the battery became depleted, but nowadays, unless you buy a fake phone, you shouldn’t experience this problem.
Most older phones use resistive screens, but that isn’t to say it’s an out-of-date technology, as phones are still being churned out using this type of screen (a good clue is normally, although not always, that the device is supplied with a stylus). Most people probably first encounter resistive screens in Windows Mobile devices (apart from the HTC HD2!).
There are two types of capacitive touchscreen generally available, surface and projected, and it’s the latter that you’ll find in smartphones. These again consist of a sandwich, but this time of two spaced layers of glass, again coated with ITO on the inside.
Depending on the particular screen, the ITO layer may be a uniform coat, a grid, or parallel stripes running at right angles on the two sheets. The latter scheme is used in the iPhone and the iPod Touch Duplo, better known as the iPad.
Think back to O Level physics, and you might remember that a capacitor consists of two plates separated by an insulating material, which may of course be air. Now picture those perpendicular stripes on two glass plates – wherever a stripe crosses one below it forms a capacitor so small it’s measured in femtofarads (10-15F).
This small size is both bad news and good: bad, because such a tiny capacitance is difficult to measure and requires complex filtering to eliminate noise; good, because given such a small capacitance it isn’t just the gap between the “plates” that affects the capacitance but also the space around them.
As your finger comes close to a capacitor it changes the local electrostatic field, and the system constantly monitors each tiny capacitor to discover exactly where the finger touched the screen: because the measurement points are discrete, it’s possible to tell whether several fingers are all touching the screen at once, unlike with a resistive unit.
With regards to the barrier on capacitive screens...
...not quite true there. There are a few protective overlays/films that you can buy for devices such as the iPhone that still allow it to function properly. The one that springs to mind is the invisibleSHIELD, which has almost no effect on the operation.
However, I removed mine as I wasn't happy with the clarity of the screen when applied (it's not bad at all but I'm picky).
By mviracca on 16 Apr 2010
Shields and RDP
I've used an invisibleSHIELD on my iPod Touch, it worked fine, although it added a layer of obscurity to the display, the same as for resistive screens.
As to RDP, I use that a lot on my iPhone, along with the Citrix client. It tends to work just fine most of the time. The biggest problem is logging out - selecting log off, then trying to scroll the screen without the Logoff dialog losing focus...
By big_D on 19 Apr 2010
invisibleSHIELD and waterproof case
I use my iPhone with an invisibleSHIELD and a Aquapac waterproof case, with no problems at all.
By Markso on 21 Apr 2010
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book
- 1.6TB SSD: why would you need one?
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- IDC: iPad intertia opens door for Windows tablets
- Office 365 goes social with "Oslo" news feed
- Windows XP: upgrading 30,000 PCs in 30 days
- LibreOffice: ignore Microsoft's "nonsense" on government's open source plans
- Intel Xeon E7 v2 servers support 6TB of RAM
- Microsoft promises video calls between Skype and Lync
- Office for iPad due before July
- Windows 7 on business PCs gets an extension
- Windows apps land on Chromebooks with VMware
- Office 365 gets two-factor authentication