Skip to navigation
Real World Computing

Banish your Wi-Fi woes

Posted on 15 Mar 2010 at 16:05

Paul Ockenden explains how to get the best out of your Wi-Fi connection

Most of us use wireless networks these days – at home, in public places, sometimes at work – yet even among those of us who specify and buy the kit there’s a widespread lack of knowledge about how Wi-Fi really works.

This is hardly surprising, since the quality of the information out there on the internet is pretty ropey (although nowhere near as bad as the info you’ll find printed on the boxes or in the instruction manuals of typical Wi-Fi kit).

I’ve seen advice such as, “if you find your neighbour is using a particular Wi-Fi channel, try switching your own router to one of the adjacent channels”, and “there are 13 usable Wi-Fi channels, so even in a crowded area you should be able to find a free one”. As you’ll see if you read on, both of these statements betray quite remarkable ignorance about 802.11 wireless networking.

So let’s start with a quick technical overview of Wi-Fi as it stands today, and how it got here. Back in the early 1990s, there were several different wireless networking products on the market but no standard.

The original 802.11 specification also allowed transmission rates of just 1 or 2Mbits/sec, which may sound slow now but back in the 1990s was plenty fast enough for most jobs

The market was dominated by names such as Xircom, Netwave, Proxim and even IBM, but none of their kit could talk to each other. Then, in 1997, the original 802.11 standard was ratified, which finally enabled interoperability between different manufacturers’ products.

The original 802.11 used the 2.4GHz frequency band (from 2.412 to 2.484), which is one of the ISM bands originally reserved by international treaty for industrial, scientific or medical purposes. Interestingly, when these ISM bands were initially defined, “communication” was specifically excluded from their uses.

More recently, the bands have been opened up for other uses, so that non-IT applications regularly employ it (2.45GHz, for example, which is slap-bang in the middle of the Wi-Fi spectrum, is the frequency of the magnetron inside the microwave oven that warms your soup).

The original 802.11 specification also allowed transmission rates of just 1 or 2Mbits/sec, which may sound slow now but back in the 1990s was plenty fast enough for most jobs. Don’t forget that most internet access was still via 56Kbits/sec dial-up lines back then.

Graphic

As you can see in the Wi-Fi Timeline box, in addition to the 2.4GHz band certain Wi-Fi variants such as 802.11a and some 802.11n kit operate at 5GHz. I’ll ignore these for the rest of this column, since most domestic and SME kit runs at 2.4GHz, and that’s what you’re most likely to encounter.

802.11 actually splits the 2.4GHz radio band into a number of fixed-frequency channels, with the main 13 channels starting at 2.412GHz for channel 1 and increasing in 5MHz increments, so that channel 13 is at 2.472GHz. The odd man out is an extra channel 14, which sits 12MHz above channel 13, but you can safely ignore that unless you’re reading this in Japan – the only country where it can be legally used.

Likewise, channels 12 and 13 are illegal in the USA, which is why the first thing most wireless networking boxes do when you set them up is ask what country or region you’re located in.

Some sneaky UK-based users living in wireless-congested areas such as large apartment blocks have been known to tell their kit that they live in Japan to allow them to use channel 14. That’s illegal, so there’s no way that I could possibly recommend that you try it.

1 2 3
User comments

Very good, interesting article. One problem I found though, is that the link to Metageek on page 2 doesn't work. It just goes to a PC Pro error page. Apart from that, I'll be using this guide next time my sister starts using her wireless laptop with my 802.11n network.

By pbryanw on 16 Mar 2010

Broken link fixed

Apologies for the broken link. Now fixed.

Barry Collins
Online Editor

By Barry_Collins on 17 Mar 2010

Channels

WiSpy is great, but its effectiveness depends on if your surrounding competition has set their channel selections to Auto.

Using 5Ghz is the easiest way to escape the jumble in the 2.4 banding.

5Ghz is also better for Point to Point links over several kilometres, for which Osbridge equipment is very handy.

As a seperate observation, much of the difficulty found within the 2.4Ghz channel could be avoided with WiFi shielding materials being used between party walls in flats and semi-detached houses during the construction phase. Perhaps this could be added onto building regs?

By Gindylow on 24 Mar 2010

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Paul Ockenden

Paul Ockenden

Paul is a contributing editor to PC Pro specialising in smartphones, mobile broadband and all things wireless. He's technical director of a combined IT and marketing company, which works on websites and intranets for several blue-chip clients.

Read more More by Paul Ockenden

advertisement

Latest Real World Computing
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds

advertisement

Sponsored Links

ADVERTISEMENT

 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

ADVERTISEMENT

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2009
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.