Has Microsoft solved our stylesheet woes with Super Preview?
Posted on 19 Jan 2010 at 11:53
Mark Newton gets to grips with Microsoft's Super Preview utility for testing web pages in different browsers
What caused a stir at launch was its ability to render a web page as if the user’s browser were IE6, IE7 and IE8, three browsers that can’t reliably co-exist on one PC.
Even I was impressed by this feature at first, and it wasn’t until I had to use it for a real project that the cracks started to appear. There are currently two huge drawbacks to Super Preview. The first is that no JavaScript code will run within Super Preview, and when you consider that in this day and age almost all websites use some JavaScript to produce Ajax-type user interaction, this limitation is crippling – Super Preview will not let you test your styles in any area that appears on command from some JavaScript code.
Its other limitation is that it doesn’t render some web pages in IE6 mode exactly as IE6 would when running on a separate machine: the differences that I’ve found so far are small, but any difference means that you can’t totally rely on it for testing your stylesheets.
There’s still no substitute for using the real browsers themselves to test your pages. In the web designer’s nirvana, we’ll have a common rendering engine that all browsers use, the differences being only extra functionality added by the various developers rather than different interpretations of the W3C standards.
Some bright Spark
Super Preview is a welcome, if flawed, tool, and it seems that Microsoft is continuing with this new policy of trying to help budding web developers with the launch of its WebsiteSpark program.
The idea behind WebsiteSpark is to help independent web developers and small companies get started, with free software and support for three years. The software bundle is considerable, including three licences for Visual Studio 2008 Professional; one licence for Expression Studio; two licences for Expression Web 3; four processor licences for Windows Server 2008 R2; and four processor licences for SQL Server 2008 Web Edition. Alongside, there’s free online training and customer referrals through the Partner program.
To qualify, you or your company have to build websites for others and have no more than ten employees. This is a great kick-start for small startups, and Microsoft obviously hopes that such people will be tempted to follow its own development route by removing the large initial outlay.
So what happens after the three years? You can either keep all the software for $999 (around £598) a year, or just the server licences for $199 (around £119) a year. Microsoft previously ran the BizSpark scheme for startups and DreamSpark for students, both of which were successful.
Helping startups is a welcome move in the current economic climate. Microsoft, of course, hopes that once developers are hooked on its products they’ll stay with the company. I take off my cynic’s hat here, because this initiative could be a boon for young companies wanting to use Microsoft technologies in which they have skills.
From around the web
What good is it if it doesn't work?
This sounded good so I installed it and tried it on a very basic personal website I'm whipping up.
In the IE6 base the DIVs were all over the place and I panicked somewhat.
Fired up VPC with one of the Microsoft compatibility images (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?F
amilyId=21EABB90-958F-4B64-B5F1-73D0A413C8EF&displ
aylang=en) and all was not so bad.
Promptly uninstalled Super Preview as a waste of time.
BTW, it’s been a while since I logged into the PC Pro website, so I went through the "forgotten password" process. Slightly flawed as the link from the email asks you for your old password!
By aidanorton on 22 Jan 2010 ![]()
Mark Newton
Mark is a contributing editor to PC Pro and managing director of the internet company ECats Ltd (Electronic CATalogueS). He specialises in internet-based solutions, often working with design houses. He works from a Victorial railway in deepest Suffolk.
advertisement
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Autonomy's Lynch joins 27,000 on way out of HP
- ICO: no fines for breaking cookie rules
- HP set to slash up to 30,000 jobs
- Government sites to miss cookie deadline
- Microsoft tweaks multi-monitor support in Windows 8
- Apple patches Leopard, despite ending support last year
- Defra opens rural broadband funding applications
- BT's broadband sales surpass calls revenue
- Apple patches multiple security issues
- FBI warns travellers to beware attacks via hotel Wi-Fi
advertisement

