The truth about Microsoft Azure - and where your data will be kept
Posted on 10 Aug 2009 at 19:17
Jon Honeyball gets stuck into the thorny matter of the service level agreements promised by Microsoft's Azure, and exactly where your data will end up
So I asked them why Microsoft gives a full SLA refund only at the 95% level, which represents nearly four-and-a-half days of downtime per month, given a nine-to-five working day. Their answer was that Microsoft’s actual uptime is vastly better than this level, but I didn’t get far when I suggested that if that’s the case then they should increase the SLA level to match the claimed internal uptime...
So where is the data kept?
No matter, the most important and interesting comment came from Mike Ziock, who actually runs the infrastructure of this service, when he made it very clear that data that was provisioned into Dublin or Amsterdam would never leave the EU – it would never be failed-over into Oregon or Singapore.
I asked for written confirmation of this, and that it be written into the Terms and Conditions for EU customers, and he said they’d look into that. When asked for a timescale for new Terms and Conditions, they wouldn’t commit.
So where does this leave us? Microsoft’s representatives say that data won’t ever leave the EU, but there’s nothing in writing to actually make this promise concrete and legally binding. The documentation and sign-up process is still an embarrassing mess of web pages that take you on a trip halfway around the internet and back, so that you have no idea whether what you’re reading actually applies to you or not. And frankly, there are still far too many weasel-words scattered around these documents for me to be happy.
I look forward to seeing fully revised and reconsidered contracts and documentation for this service, and until that happens my worries won’t go away, and that no amount of “Oh no, we didn’t mean THAT, we meant THIS” will be good enough to allay them.
I’d like to truly believe that this has just been the result of a grand cock-up, that senior Microsoft managers didn’t properly think things through, and that time and circumstances got the better of them. That would be preferable to believing that Microsoft is merely a large-but-tin-pot North American company that couldn’t spell “world class service” if its life depended on it.
Or worse still, that it doesn’t give a damn about international customers, and rolls out stuff that’s alright for Des Moines, Iowa, which is about as far as its world-view and due diligence can stretch. Or worst of all, that lawyers and accountants run Microsoft nowadays, and that the risks they seek to mitigate and the financial exposures they wish to minimise are their own, rather than those of their customers.
All I’ll say is this hasn’t been a pleasant experience, and that now my own trial period on hosted Exchange Server has come to an end, I will not be signing up to the full server deal.
From around the web
I suppose data security to some companies that join the M$ Cloud is not a big concern to them, but there will always be companies whose data is way too sensitive to be released into the cloud and they will want & need assurances from M$ that their data does not wander off and out from their own control. Again some may be under the paranoid impression that competitors bribe datacentre administrators.
By nicomo on 13 Aug 2009 ![]()
Who's data where's data?
Private data gets shunted around the globe now whether we like it or not.
How else does an chap with poor English get bankers details when they are on a telephone in India?
By lenmontieth on 17 Aug 2009 ![]()
No need to apologise at all Jon this is a simply HUGE issue with considerable legal implications. I find it very worrying that M$ can have so completely failed to understand the market that they are involved in .
By stokegabriel on 24 Aug 2009 ![]()
Jon Honeyball
Jon is one of the UK's most respected IT journalists and a contributing editor to PC Pro since it launched in 1994. He specialises in Microsoft technologies, including client/server and office automation applications.
advertisement
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Autonomy's Lynch joins 27,000 on way out of HP
- ICO: no fines for breaking cookie rules
- HP set to slash up to 30,000 jobs
- Government sites to miss cookie deadline
- Microsoft tweaks multi-monitor support in Windows 8
- Apple patches Leopard, despite ending support last year
- Defra opens rural broadband funding applications
- BT's broadband sales surpass calls revenue
- Apple patches multiple security issues
- FBI warns travellers to beware attacks via hotel Wi-Fi
advertisement
