The truth about Microsoft Azure - and where your data will be kept
Posted on 10 Aug 2009 at 19:17
Jon Honeyball gets stuck into the thorny matter of the service level agreements promised by Microsoft's Azure, and exactly where your data will end up
Another month goes by and I have some more important updates to the continuing saga of Microsoft’s hosted solutions services. I ought to apologise for banging on for so long about this matter, because I must be starting to sound like a stuck record.
Actually, no, take that back – I don’t apologise at all, because this is a hugely important subject, over which vendors including Microsoft are taking their customer base for a ride. It isn’t good enough, and you need to know about it.
To do a quick recap for the latecomers, Microsoft is now offering a set of hosted services – Exchange Server, SharePoint, Navision and so forth – in its Cloud of datacenters distributed around the world. This service has now gone live, after a short beta trial period, and has been running for a while for American customers.
Moving your IT infrastructure outside the four walls of your business is a move that needs very careful consideration. Putting your line-of-business applications into a space that you don’t fully control demands that you have really thought through all the risks associated with it.
What is the promised uptime of the proposed service? Is your internet connectivity good enough to support such a move? What about your staffing? What happens for data archiving, backup and recovery? What is the legal framework under which your chosen vendor works?
All of these questions need to be answered positively if you’re to have done even an approximation of due diligence and appropriate business risk analysis.
Of course, these same questions should be applied when hosting your own service in-house. Do you have the appropriate staff available on site or available at short notice? Who is responsible for backup, disaster recovery and archiving? Is the machine room equipment up to the task, including the power feed, air-conditioning and the servers themselves? Who’s going to ensure your servers are kept up to date, and who will fix them?
None of this is rocket science, but the point I’m making is that the management of “in-house” solutions is extremely well understood (even if many companies manage to make a dog’s dinner of its implementation). The real worry is that off-site hosted solutions introduce a whole set of new questions to be answered, many of which aren’t particularly obvious if you’ve been running an in-house solution.
Unobvious problems
One of these unobvious questions is, “Just where is your data going to be kept?”
Microsoft’s documentation has been nothing short of disastrous on this subject – actually, I’d go further and say that the hosted services roll-out in Europe has been the biggest cock-up that I’ve seen in the past 20 years from Microsoft.
The documentation has been a mishmash of American contracts with stuff for the EU/UK deployment. Dig through the website and you’ll end up in a maze of twisting passages, all alike, and then suddenly find yourself emerging into a space that’s clearly designed for the US and not for the UK.
As one small example, you might have started out on Microsoft's home page, but suddenly you’ll find yourself at http://mocp.microsoftonline.com. It’s that obvious.
Since the business framework for hosted services is so important, I’ve been pushing Microsoft for clarifications for over six months now, and this journey too has become a maze of twisting passages: emails and documents that directly contradict other documents; Microsoft changing the terms and conditions and not telling anyone; and some moves that are frankly bordering on the deceptive. Let me give you an example.
From around the web
I suppose data security to some companies that join the M$ Cloud is not a big concern to them, but there will always be companies whose data is way too sensitive to be released into the cloud and they will want & need assurances from M$ that their data does not wander off and out from their own control. Again some may be under the paranoid impression that competitors bribe datacentre administrators.
By nicomo on 13 Aug 2009 ![]()
Who's data where's data?
Private data gets shunted around the globe now whether we like it or not.
How else does an chap with poor English get bankers details when they are on a telephone in India?
By lenmontieth on 17 Aug 2009 ![]()
No need to apologise at all Jon this is a simply HUGE issue with considerable legal implications. I find it very worrying that M$ can have so completely failed to understand the market that they are involved in .
By stokegabriel on 24 Aug 2009 ![]()
Jon Honeyball
Jon is one of the UK's most respected IT journalists and a contributing editor to PC Pro since it launched in 1994. He specialises in Microsoft technologies, including client/server and office automation applications.
advertisement
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- SAP willing to share HANA with Oracle
- Why using a tablet could harm your health
- New RIM boss: no need for drastic change
- RIM founders fall on their swords
- Slow economy helps boost Red Hat revenue by 23%
- Google+ pages get multiple admins
- One in five companies lack card industry compliance
- Oil industry warns hacking attacks could kill
- British workers fear email monitoring
advertisement
