BlackBerry's App World vs Apple's App Store

Posted on 15 Jun 2009 at 15:55

Paul Ockenden tries out the BlackBerry's App World, and sees how it compares to Apple's App Store

The mobile phone manufacturers continue to roll out their online application stores, as a response to the incredible success of Apple’s App Store, and as a BlackBerry fan I was keen to try its App World service to see how it stands up.

At first I was impressed, as the actual store application that runs on your phone feels very good, as if it’s moved the standard for BlackBerry applications onward a little. You know the way that iPhone applications tend to have a Web 2.0 feel about them? Well RIM’s App World application has it too, but unfortunately, that’s one of the few plus points I could find.

The real killer is that the BlackBerry applications themselves tend to be quite poor compared to their iPhone rivals

On the downside, the range of applications available isn’t great, the pricing seems to be in US dollars only, even though I signed in from a UK account, and far too many of the applications available are highly US-centric (even ones that claim to be UK versions).

App World is certainly better than the previous web-based offering that was linked from the BlackBerry mobile homepage, but it’s no competitor for the App Store.

And the final straw is that app installation is nowhere near as clean and simple as Apple’s version, usually requiring more key presses and sometimes even a reboot (yechh). I realise that App Store was far from perfect when it launched and that it’s taken time to improve, but I can’t help thinking RIM has really missed a trick here.

But, as I’ve said in a previous column, the real killer is that the BlackBerry applications themselves tend to be quite poor compared to their iPhone rivals.

Take RIM’s new BlackBerry client, released just a week before I wrote this. While much better than the previous effort, it still lags a country mile behind the iPhone client, which has been out for several months now.

To be honest, I’m starting to worry slightly for RIM and its BlackBerry line-up. Where it has traditionally done well is in terms of security, battery life, lower data usage, usability, and of course email functionality. But are these virtues still unique for the Canadian manufacturer?

When it comes to security, RIM is undoubtedly up there among the leaders: the fact that the US president is allowed to carry a BlackBerry (albeit a heavily tweaked one) testifies to that. Battery life is still good too, but as the Nokia E75 shows the others are catching up fast.

BlackBerry’s careful use of mobile data volume is far less of a plus than it used to be, as speeds become faster and data bundles offered by the networks become less stingy.

For usability the BlackBerry OS is still great, but if you hand a novice a BlackBerry Curve and an iPhone and ask them to perform a few simple tasks, I reckon the iPhone would win hands down since everything is just more intuitive.

Then there’s email functionality, where the BlackBerry still wins insofar as it can still talk to Exchange Servers back as far as version 5.5, as well as to Domino and GroupWise, which its main competitors can’t touch; but the BlackBerry can only read (not send) HTML emails, which is making it start to seem a little long-in-the-tooth.

There’s a new BlackBerry OS (version 5) due out later this year, but from the leaked specs and screenshots that I’ve seen that’s a case of evolution rather than revolution.

I know RIM is currently posting record sales, mainly to new owners, but I wonder what will happen a year to 18 months down the line, when those people move on to their next phone. Will they stick with BlackBerry? Unless RIM raises its game significantly I’m not convinced they will.

Download a year of Paul Ockenden's Mobile & Wireless columns by heading to our Free Downloads site