Exclaiming your space
Posted on 8 Feb 2008 at 15:25
Jon Honeyball sorts out the mess in his mailbox and fuels the windows release date rumours, while David Moss looks at Vista's redirection capabilities.
Last month, I pointed out that user profiles under XP and Vista use totally different formats. User profiles in Vista are identifiable because they have a .v2 appended to the end of the username. This creates a space issue. The user will basically be moving more data about and will require more storage space than previously to house the two OS profiles.
Folder redirection is the key to letting users see all of their data in each profile, as you can redirect Documents and My Documents to the same folder. When you do so, you must make use of the "Also apply redirection policy to Windows 2000, Windows 2000 Server, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003 operating systems" checkbox when you set up the folder redirection using your Vista box. You must use the same setting for Desktop, but don't enable that setting for Application Data and Start Menu redirection.
However, once you start using a Vista system to work on your group policies, you must carry on using a Vista system to manage those policies. If you switch to an earlier operating system and try to work on group policies there, you'll find you won't be able to. You'll get a ton of error messages and everything will appear broken, and that's because it is broken as far as the earlier operating systems are concerned - they just can't read what Vista has done, so once you go down the Vista route, at least as far as group policy configuration is concerned, you're pretty much stuck with it unless you fancy a lot of hard work recreating all your policies by hand.
So far, we've looked at roaming profiles and folder redirection, but there's another technology that's interlinked in my opinion; namely, file synchronisation. It's an area that looks simple and sometimes isn't. In fact, it's an area that can drive you to distraction, especially when you're trying to get rid of old synchronisation settings that just won't go away when you want them to. But I'll talk about that next month.
David Moss
advertisement
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device
- Microsoft Office 2010 screenshots: Recover unsaved items
- Microsoft Word 2010 screenshots: Text Effects
- Microsoft Word 2010: inserting screenshots
- Q&A: Why Conficker was a victim of its own success
- App developers losing faith in Android
- Biz Stone: Murdoch's Google veto will "fail fast"
- Google adds automatic captions to YouTube
- China ramps up cyber spying
- Mozilla maintains dependence on Google
- Windows 7 flying off the shelves
- Google Chrome OS: full details unveiled
- AOL slashes 2,500 jobs
- YouTube begins streaming full-length shows
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk


