Security officials deny banning BlackBerry 10 from government use
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 20 Mar 2013 at 15:14
BlackBerry and security officials have denied the OS has been banned for restricted use in government, following media reports.
Such a rejection would be bad news for the company, which is relying on the BlackBerry 10 OS and Z10 smartphone to revitalise the firm's fortunes.
Despite sales troubles in the consumer market, BlackBerry has remained a significant player in the enterprise and government space because of its normally impressive security controls.
Its previous handsets had been cleared to handle "restricted" data, and the government is one of BlackBerry's biggest UK customers.
According to a report in The Guardian, the software has been rejected by the UK's Communications-Electronics Security Group (CESG) because it fails to meet standards for "essential work", notably around BlackBerry Balance, a tool to separate work and private content.
However, the CESG denied the evaluation had even started yet. "Discussions with BlackBerry are ongoing about the use of the BlackBerry 10 platform in government," the CESG said in a statement. "We have not yet performed an evaluation of the security of that platform, but we expect to be issuing Platform Guidance in the summer. This will cover a number of platforms including Blackberry 10 (and the use of 'Balance')."
"We have a long standing security partnership with BlackBerry and this gives us confidence that the BlackBerry 10 platform is likely to represent a viable solution for UK Government," it added.
The manufacturer has acknowledged that the CESG has yet to approve the Z10, and noted that the process had recently changed
"We have a long-established relationship with CESG and we remain the only mobile solution approved for use at 'Restricted' when configured in accordance with CESG guidelines," the company said in a statement.
"This level of approval only comes following a process which is rigorous and absolutely necessary given the highly confidential nature of the communications being transmitted," BlackBerry added.
"The current restructuring of this approval process, due to the Government Protective Marking Scheme review and the new CESG Commercial Product Assurance scheme has an impact on the timeline for BlackBerry 10 to receive a similar level of approval."
The company also pointed out that it was given security clearance in the US and Germany.
So ask The Guardian then?
Your original story and headline have probably done some damage to Blackberry and now it has been refuted by those claimed as sources. Apology then? Have you asked The Guardian for evidence of their story? Are you journalists or gossip mongers?
By jonathandk2 on 22 Mar 2013
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Please stop reposting fake Facebook messages
- Is Facebook safe for business?
- Don't rely on Chrome's password vault
- Facebook Graph Search: don't panic
- Gmail drafts and Pastebin: could they evade the email snoops?
- Applying for a job at GCHQ? Here's your plain-text password
- Google two-step verification: a must for business email
- Yes, I write down my passwords