Microsoft: patch now or risk attack
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 14 Mar 2012 at 09:56
Microsoft is urging people to waste no time in applying its latest security patch, warning that it expects to see exploits targeting vulnerabilities addressed in the update within 30 days.
According to Microsoft, update MS12-020 addresses two vulnerabilities in Microsoft’s implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), and one of the flaws is a remote code execution vulnerability affecting all versions of Windows.
We expect to see working exploit code developed within the next 30 days
Attackers could use the vulnerability to remotely access computers without authorisation.
Microsoft said it “strongly encouraged” users to make “a special priority of applying this particular update” because the potential rewards for attackers would make the vulnerability too tempting to ignore.
“We are not aware of any attacks in the wild and the remote desktop protocol is disabled by default,” the company said in its security blog outlining the problem and how system administrators should deal with it.
“However, due to the attractiveness of this vulnerability to attackers, we anticipate that an exploit for code execution will be developed in the next 30 days.”
Microsoft said attackers could exploit the vulnerability over networks before authentication was required because “RDP is commonly allowed through firewalls due to its utility”.
The service runs in kernel-mode as SYSTEM by default on almost all platforms, the company said.
“We determined that this vulnerability is directly exploitable for code execution,” Microsoft said.
“Developing a working exploit will not be trivial – we would be surprised to see one developed in the next few days. However, we expect to see working exploit code developed within the next 30 days.”
Really?
'...warning that it expects to see exploits of patched vulnerabilities within 30 days...'
Am I reading that wrong, or should that be 'un-patched'?
By synaptic_fire on 14 Mar 2012 ![]()
Really?
'...warning that it expects to see exploits of patched vulnerabilities within 30 days...'
Am I reading that wrong, or should that be 'un-patched'?
By synaptic_fire on 14 Mar 2012 ![]()
Double post.
Sorry about that. I posted the first reply five mins before the second. I assumed I had forgotten to press submit the first time. Then after posting a second time, both appeared.
Problem may well be my ISP's cache.
By synaptic_fire on 14 Mar 2012 ![]()
@synaptic_fire
No, you read it correctly. This was a previously not widely known bug (one the bad guys hadn't found and exploited).
Now that MS have patched it, the bad guys can analyse the code and see how they can exploit the code, which will leave those unpatched machines vulnerable to attack.
By big_D on 14 Mar 2012 ![]()
@big_D
Cheers pal. That makes far more sense. Though I see it has now been edited to read a little clearer.
By synaptic_fire on 14 Mar 2012 ![]()
I often wonder what information MS collects from our machines whilst its 'updating'- same with anti-virus software. A few years ago you made a conscious action to connect to the web- now we are connected all the time and consequently constantly vulnerable.
By Martin_Kay1 on 15 Mar 2012 ![]()
@Martin_Kay1
Only what you tell them to collect. You agree to allow them to collect anonymous usage information, or not, when you set up the computer.
By big_D on 15 Mar 2012 ![]()
@big_D
I bet they are taking an awful lot more than they let on......and whether you give them permission or not !
How can you monitor what they are taking ?
Cheers
By greenee on 15 Mar 2012 ![]()
@big_D
I bet they are taking an awful lot more than they let on......and whether you give them permission or not !
How can you monitor what they are taking ?
Cheers
By greenee on 15 Mar 2012 ![]()
NATed connections
Most home users will be unaffected, unless ISPs have been issuing routers with port 3389 forwarded.
By S_Elwell on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
Checking the installed patch
Does anyone know the reference number for this patch so we can check it has installed? They seem to start KB.... or the definition number?
By Gz_peterbird38e3 on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
Reply to: Checking the installed patch
@Gz_peterbird38e3
For people with typical Windows desktop OSs it will be either KB2621440 or KB2667402.
For info see here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bullet
in/ms12-020.
This update was included in the March 2012 Microsoft Update cycle that was released earlier this week.
Hope this helps.
By Gz_mags2mk669ed0 on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
Reply to: Checking the installed patch
@Gz_peterbird38e3
For people with typical Windows desktop OSs it will be either KB2621440 or KB2667402.
For info see here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bullet
in/ms12-020.
This update was included in the March 2012 Microsoft Update cycle that was released earlier this week.
Hope this helps.
By Gz_mags2mk669ed0 on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
Reply to: Checking the installed patch
@Gz_peterbird38e3
For people with typical Windows desktop OSs it will be either KB2621440 or KB2667402.
For info see here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bullet
in/ms12-020.
This update was included in the March 2012 Microsoft Update cycle that was released earlier this week.
Hope this helps.
By Gz_mags2mk669ed0 on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
Reply to: Checking the installed patch
@Gz_peterbird38e3
For people with typical Windows desktop OSs it will be either KB2621440 or KB2667402.
For info see here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bullet
in/ms12-020.
This update was included in the March 2012 Microsoft Update cycle that was released earlier this week.
Hope this helps.
By Gz_mags2mk669ed0 on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
Reply to: Checking the installed patch
@Gz_peterbird38e3
For people with typical Windows desktop OSs it will be either KB2621440 or KB2667402.
For info see here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bullet
in/ms12-020.
This update was included in the March 2012 Microsoft Update cycle that was released earlier this week.
Hope this helps.
By Gz_mags2mk669ed0 on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
Reply to: Checking the installed patch
@Gz_peterbird38e3
For people with typical Windows desktop OSs it will be either KB2621440 or KB2667402.
For info see here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bullet
in/ms12-020.
This update was included in the March 2012 Microsoft Update cycle that was released earlier this week.
Hope this helps.
By Gz_mags2mk669ed0 on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
Reply to: Checking the installed patch
@Gz_peterbird38e3
For people with typical Windows desktop OSs it will be either KB2621440 or KB2667402.
For info see here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bullet
in/ms12-020.
This update was included in the March 2012 Microsoft Update cycle that was released earlier this week.
Hope this helps.
By Gz_mags2mk669ed0 on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
Ooops x7 !!
V.sorry for multiple posts - been clicking links in PC-Pro email newsletters and misinterpreted what Firefox "resend" GUI was about. Admin/Moderator pls could you take out all the repeats.
Thanks
By Gz_mags2mk669ed0 on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
Ooops indeed!
Gz_mags2mk669ed0 - it's not you, it's the very poorly designed system. I wonder if the team behind PC Pro's site and forums are as embarrassed as it's readers would be if they produced such a 3rd rate, substandard site design? Get your fingers out guys and fix the forums...oh, and while you're at it, fix the database linking in your right hand column so that the latest news etc isn't statically linked to the original post - reading a 'latest news' post which is 4 months old because the page you are reading is of the same vintage is not cool!
By Minou on 16 Mar 2012 ![]()
PC Amateur 'Forum'
I don't think PC Amateur will be updating the 'forum' any time soon, it's been this shit for two years and they haven't done anything despite all the protestations. They obviously don't care unless you're making derogatory comments about ipaedos.
By dodge1963 on 20 Mar 2012 ![]()
advertisement
- Huawei Ascend P6 review: first look
- Adobe Illustrator CC review: first look
- Let MPs tell us what they really want ISPs to block
- Adobe Photoshop CC review: first look
- WWDC 2013 and iOS 7 launch: live blog
- Sony VAIO Pro review: first look
- Want child porn blocked? Meet the IWF
- Is it worth upgrading a media centre to Windows 8?
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- Google two-step verification: a must for business email
- Yes, I write down my passwords
- How to deal with a ransomware attack
- How secure is your Wi-Fi network?
- How QR codes caught out the security pros
- Why I do not trust Do Not Track... yet
- The hard disks you can "secure" with a single-digit password
- Why I've started using a password manager
- Time to kill off CAPTCHA
- Are today's young people Generation I (for insecure)?
Lenovo Reviews
advertisement
Read More
