Ministers snub iPhone over security concerns
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 16 Jun 2010 at 12:27
The iPhone might be selling like hotcakes among the public, but the smartphone remains out of favour in Whitehall.
Ministers are sticking with their BlackBerry handsets because Apple's haven't been given security clearance.
The news comes after Tom Watson, Labour MP for West Bromwich East, asked all government departments which ministers had been supplied with which phones, and all said they had only supplied with Research in Motion's smartphones as this was the only approved handset company.
“The only mobile telecoms or personal digital assistant devices that have been issued to ministers of the department are BlackBerry devices,” wrote Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Department of Health Simon Barns in a written response to the question.
“The Department does not issue Apple iPhones to staff as these are not approved for Government use by the CESG.
“CESG is the Information Assurance arm of GCHQ which aims to protect and promote the vital interests of the United Kingdom by providing advice and assistance on the security of communications and electronic data.”
The response was mirrored by all the other departments that have so far responded to the question. Ministerial phones require accreditation from CESG.
CESG told PC Pro that while iPhones were not banned, they were not cleared for use by ministers.
“CESG doesn't ban products,” a spokesperson said. “CESG only assures products submitted to us by vendors and for which there is a demand within Government.”
Apple did not say whether it had applied for CESG certification at the time of going to press.
From around the web
Is this the same body which earlier this year decided to upgrade computers in the house of commons to Windows Vista?
By gavmeister on 16 Jun 2010 ![]()
No
By a_byrne22 on 16 Jun 2010 ![]()
Dodgy PC Pro headline
Firstly it's not the minsters who are snubbing the iPhone, secondly if the core app is messaging then Blackberry is a far better solution.
Oops -looks like a bit of a non-story.
By milliganp on 16 Jun 2010 ![]()
No? OK, so it's multiple government agencies which are incompetent and backward-looking on IT, not just one.
By gavmeister on 16 Jun 2010 ![]()
@miliganp
Our users dropped BlackBerry devices for iPhones, because they were easier to use and provided better messaging capabilities than the BlackBerry + BES combination. As they talk directly with our Exchange Server, it also means that we don't have to run a secondary server for BB messaging.
One big plus is the iPhones handling of attachments, the management get a PDF report of the days business.
On the iPhone, they can pan and zoom and read the report. On the BlackBerry, it is scaled to 1 pixel per character and the users can't zoom in... :-S
By big_D on 17 Jun 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why antivirus is fighting a losing battle in your office
- Four year olds used to steal their parents' data
- An acceptable use policy for your kids
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Pavement hacking: What it is and how to avoid it
- Google's risky pre-loaded pages
- Mac under attack: how secure is Apple's OS?
- Has your browser been hijacked?
advertisement
