Daily Mail backtracks on Facebook paedophiles
By Hani Megerisi
Posted on 11 Mar 2010 at 10:37
Facebook has vowed to sue the Daily Mail after an article claimed the site was a haven for paedophiles.
The newspaper ran an ‘investigative’ piece in yesterday’s edition, where the writer claimed to have posed as a 14-year-old girl on Facebook and been approached by a number of men.
"Even after 15 years in child protection, I was shocked by what I encountered when I spent just five minutes on Facebook posing as a 14-year-old girl," the article read. "Within 90 seconds, a middle-aged man wanted to perform a sex act in front of me."
We wrongly stated that he had conducted an experiment into social networking sites by posing as a 14-year-old girl on Facebook with the result that he quickly attracted sexually motivated messages. In fact he had used a different social-networking site
However, within hours of the story appearing online, the article’s headline was changed from “I posed as a 14-year-old girl on Facebook. What followed will sicken you” to “I posed as a girl of 14 online. What followed will sicken you”.
The paper issued a correction online at 12:28am this morning, stating: “In an article by a criminologist yesterday, we wrongly stated that he had conducted an experiment into social-networking sites by posing as a 14-year-old girl on Facebook with the result that he quickly attracted sexually motivated messages. In fact he had used a different social networking site for this exercise. We are happy to set the record straight.”
Mark Williams-Thomas, the detective and criminologist credited with the piece, has now been drawn into the centre of the row after telling the BBC's Rory Cellan-Jones the piece was ghost written on his behalf by the Daily Mail, who ignored his comments that the investigation was not conducted on Facebook.
Facebook claims it contacted Williams-Thomas and confirmed that he had told the Daily Mail, prior to publication, that the social-networking site used was not Facebook. The site's lawyers said in a letter that the Daily Mail had made "false and defamatory statements in the article," the BBC reported.
The social-networking giant has recently been at the centre of a child protection controversy, after a girl was abducted and killed by a man she met on Facebook.
From around the web
You didn't expect the turth, did you?
Well, it's the Daily Mail, what do you expect? The Truth? Makes you wonder about the intellects of the millions who believe them on politics...
By SwissMac on 11 Mar 2010 ![]()
Daily Mail journalist is sick pedo!
There, that got their attention!
So, a man pretends to be a 14 year old girl looking for fun. Sounds like he was grooming. How many innapropriate advances did he get from teenagers?
Another sick stunt from the daily mail which is itself now "grooming"
By darkhairedlord on 11 Mar 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- How to install Internet Explorer 9
- Maintaining and supporting IE9
- Plan your deployment
- Creating a custom browser package
- Search in corporate environments
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Amazon Kindle Fire review: first look
- Lytro light-field camera: first look
- CES: Why booth babes are bad marketing
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Pavement hacking: What it is and how to avoid it
- Google's risky pre-loaded pages
- Mac under attack: how secure is Apple's OS?
- Has your browser been hijacked?
- Can you send a truly anonymous email?
- Is it safe to send bank details over email?
- Sainsbury's Bank bans password storage
- MobileMe triggers credit card blocks
- How to stay safe against session hijacking
advertisement
