Richard Stallman names Day Against DRM
By Barry Collins
Posted on 26 Feb 2010 at 09:43
Free software zealot, Richard Stallman, has declared 4 May as the first Day Against DRM.
Stallman, the president of the Free Software Foundation and founder of the GNU project, claims it's time to raise awareness of the dangers of the copy protection applied to movies, music and other digital content.
"DRM attacks your freedom at two levels," said Stallman. "Its purpose is to attack your freedom by restricting your use of your copies of published works. Its means is to force you to use proprietary software, which means you don't control what it does. When companies organise to design products to restrict us, we have to organise to defeat them."
They are designed to lock people into specific software and devices, destroying your rights to free speech
The anti-DRM day has also won the backing of the Open Rights Group. "DRM is a disaster for legitimate uses of music, film and books," claims executive director Jim Killock.
"They are designed to lock people into specific software and devices, destroying your rights to free speech uses like criticism, education and review. DRM means you lose control, and are at the mercy of vendors."
Although many music services, including the market-leading iTunes, have edged away from DRM, it still remains a prevalent force. The BBC's iPlayer, commercial eBook publishers and leading games publishers all lock their products with copy protection.
The FSF says it will announce details of events for the Day Against DRM as we move closer to the 4 May.
From around the web
May the fourth be with you!
:)
By thirdbrother3 on 26 Feb 2010 ![]()
symbolism
Given the fact the Mr. R. Stallman had studied sinology, internal logic of the Chinese language and psychiatry, I believe he has chosen this date because of the pronunciation
and symbolism of May 4th. Number 5 brings luck, while 4 sounds like "death".
By stasi47 on 26 Feb 2010 ![]()
DRM? What DRM?
A simple Google search will bring up lists of software that remove DRM on video and music.
But I wholeheartedly agree, it shouldn't be there in the first place.
If I legitimately buy music/video on 'real' media such as CD/DVD I can play it on any player I like. Why should my downloaded material be restricted solely to the device it was downloaded onto?
By jontym123 on 27 Feb 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why antivirus is fighting a losing battle in your office
- Four year olds used to steal their parents' data
- An acceptable use policy for your kids
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Pavement hacking: What it is and how to avoid it
- Google's risky pre-loaded pages
- Mac under attack: how secure is Apple's OS?
- Has your browser been hijacked?
advertisement
