Microsoft secretly beheads notorious botnet
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 25 Feb 2010 at 09:06
Microsoft has won court approval to deactivate 277 domain names that are being used to control a vast network of infected PCs.
The software giant claims the notorious Waledac botnet is being used by Eastern European spammers to send 1.5 billion spam messages every day, and infect hundreds of thousands of machines with malware.
In a suit filed in the US District Court of Eastern Virginia, Microsoft accused 27 unnamed defendants of violating federal computer crime laws.
It further requested that domain registrar Verisign temporarily deactivate the domains, shutting down the control servers being used to send commands to the machines.
The operation hasn’t cleaned the infected computers and is not a silver bullet for undoing all the damage we believe Waledac has caused
The request was secretly approved by District Judge Leonie Brinkema, allowing the action to be taken covertly, preventing Waledac's operators from switching domains.
However, while Microsoft hailed the victory, it claimed the work was far from over. "Operation b49 [Microsoft's codename for the operation] has effectively shut down connections to the vast majority of Waledac-infected computers, and our goal is to make that disruption permanent," the company wrote on its blog.
"But the operation hasn’t cleaned the infected computers and is not a silver bullet for undoing all the damage we believe Waledac has caused. Although the zombies are now largely out of the bot-herders’ control, they are still infected with the original malware," it concluded.
That's *Windows* botnet
Another story about a Windows botnet that somehow manages to avoid the word "Windows" completely.
It's little more than a Microsoft press release.
By BrownieBoy6 on 25 Feb 2010
Of course it is
@BrownieBoy6: Of course it's a Windows BotNet - what would be the point in creating a BotNet for an OS *other* than the planet's most dominant?
Windows ain't perfect, but it's fallacious to assume that other OS's are immune. They're not immune, they're just unpopular.
By wanstronian on 26 Feb 2010
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- Apple Watch, iPhone 6 and 6 Plus: Tim Cook's Apple back with a bang?
- BT Home Hub 5: how to get maximum speed
- 20 years of PC Pro: one-star reviews (including "the worst tablet we've ever seen")
- 20 years of PC Pro: our best covers
- Why we've closed the PC Pro forums
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Please stop reposting fake Facebook messages
- Is Facebook safe for business?
- Don't rely on Chrome's password vault
- Facebook Graph Search: don't panic
- Gmail drafts and Pastebin: could they evade the email snoops?
- Applying for a job at GCHQ? Here's your plain-text password
- Google two-step verification: a must for business email
- Yes, I write down my passwords