Insurers deny Twitter will push up premiums
By Hani Megerisi
Posted on 23 Feb 2010 at 14:40
Insurance companies have refuted suggestions that careless use of social-networking sites could push up premiums.
Speaking to the Telegraph, Darren Black, head of home insurance at Confused.com, said that premium rises of up to 10% could be possible with the increase in social-networking usage and criminals’ exploitation of the web.
However, several members of the insurance industry have told PC Pro that use of social networking is not taken into account when firms are assessing claims.
Follow us!
Click here to follow PC Pro on TwitterIn fact, it doesn't impact on claims at all, according to Malcolm Tarling at the Association of British Insurers. He said that, while “insurers always look at the impact of trends” such as social networking, any comments made to the public were “merely advising people to protect their possessions... in a similar way to advisory notices from the police”.
Mr Tarling cited websites such as Pleaserobme.com for heightening fears over social networking, but reiterated that the use of these sites hadn't affected investigations into claims.
Tarling's comments were backed up by a spokesperson from insurance provider More Than, who said that the use of services such as Facebook and Twitter was “not relevant to insurance claims at the moment”.
A spokesman for DirectLine said that "when a customer applies for home insurance we do not ask them any questions, or provide assumptions for them to agree with regarding their use of social networking sites."
However, the spokesman did concede that "disclosing information that could have a direct impact on a person's individual or home security could potentially impact a claim."
When asked to cite examples of insurance firms punishing customers for social-networking slip ups, Darren Black told PC Pro that his comments in the interview were merely a projection of “possible future trends” and that a person’s use of Facebook or Twitter was “not in anyone’s pricing at the moment”.
From around the web
Disingenuous
If insurers consider that there is additional risk when their customers expose all their details on social networking sites, then surely an increase in premium is the logical response. How is this different from all other types of insured risk?
By JohnGray7581 on 23 Feb 2010 ![]()
Where's the evidence?
"Insurance companies have refuted suggestions that careless use of social-networking sites could push up premiums." What evidence did they produce? It is not given in the article. If the word "refute" is used then evidence must be produced at the same time as the word is used in order to back it up. If no evidence is available at that time then they are either using the wrong english word or are liars!
By BornOnTheCusp on 23 Feb 2010 ![]()
Dave
Surely it needs to be considered if someone is posting they are going away for abroad for x days on a OSN and don't even have a decent privacy settings switched on?
Why should people who are careful pay the price of the foolish?
By kingct on 23 Feb 2010 ![]()
Deny what?
The comment from Black says its about "possible future trends" and that its "not in anyones pricing at the moment" from what I can see both the ABI and Direct line have confirmed that in their comments!
By CharlieHorse on 24 Feb 2010 ![]()
"Why should people who are careful pay the price of the foolish?"
It happens in every other insurance market...
By robgt1 on 24 Feb 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why antivirus is fighting a losing battle in your office
- Four year olds used to steal their parents' data
- An acceptable use policy for your kids
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Pavement hacking: What it is and how to avoid it
- Google's risky pre-loaded pages
- Mac under attack: how secure is Apple's OS?
- Has your browser been hijacked?
advertisement
